Under 1 Year but Over 6 month Rule - Secondary Evidence Needed

Missing 2008 Tax Form

As I was requesting my father's 2008 tax form from the CPA, I was informed that my father did not list me as a dependent in 2008. I was out of the country, on the 11-month trip, during that time. Prior to 2008 I had never filed taxes on my own and my father had always listed me as a dependent. For some reason, he decided since I was not in the country for most of the year, that he would not list me as a dependent.

When I returned, I was listed as a dependent in 2009, and filed taxes on my own in 2010 for the first time.

My question is: When the IO asks to see the previous 5 years of tax returns, can I simply explain my case and plead ignorance to the rule? Or will I have to back file taxes in 2008 even though I made no income?
 
As I was requesting my father's 2008 tax form from the CPA, I was informed that my father did not list me as a dependent in 2008. I was out of the country, on the 11-month trip, during that time. Prior to 2008 I had never filed taxes on my own and my father had always listed me as a dependent. For some reason, he decided since I was not in the country for most of the year, that he would not list me as a dependent.

When I returned, I was listed as a dependent in 2009, and filed taxes on my own in 2010 for the first time.

My question is: When the IO asks to see the previous 5 years of tax returns, can I simply explain my case and plead ignorance to the rule? Or will I have to back file taxes in 2008 even though I made no income?

Just explain that your income that year was too low for you to be required to file.
 
Just explain that your income that year was too low for you to be required to file.

Thanks. I've gotten everything else on the list of secondary evidence that I would need, so I didn't want this one thing to trip me up. My interview is on the 10th and I'm getting really anxious. Just want everything to go smoothly and you guys have been a big help. Thanks again.
 
Top