The best chance to reduce FBI Name Check Delay this year

DavidZ

Registered Users (C)
U.S. House conference members will negotiate Senate’s amendment with Senate members as early as THIS WEEK. Please see my previous posting on this same topic.
Currently, Legal Immigrant Association (LIA: www.legalimmigrant.org) and its lobbyists are running a campaign to improve Sen. Levin’s amendment with “Supervisory Review Upon Request”, which could effectively limit any name check process within one year. The House Representatives in the House-Senate conference will decide if LIA’s proposal will be adopted and imposed upon Levin’s amendment.
To convince the House conference members, LIA urges Name Check sufferers to conduct an INSTANT campaign (visit district office or call the congressman/woman office). LIA’s lobbyists offered detailed campaign guidance, as follows. Please act ASAP!

Here is the lobby guidance created by LIA’s lobbyists.

1. Call your representative's district office. Identify yourself as a constituent, give your name, and explain that this is a LEGISLATIVE matter but you'd like to speak to someone in the DISTRICT office who handles immigration. Ask for a meeting ASAP and bring as many people to that meeting as you can (especially including CITIZENS such as employers, co-workers, impressive alumni, church people, friends etc.).

2. If you have scheduled a meeting, you will be meeting with district staff but not a LEGISLATIVE staff. Let Mr. Paul Donnelly (pauldonnelly@medialever.com) know you meeting schedule and he will tell you the name of the LEGISLATIVE staff in Washington.

3. In the meeting, please use your own stories to make the following points:
1) The delays in clearing name checks are unacceptable, NOT ONLY because it is a disservice to LEGAL immigrants, BUT ALSO it is a national security threat.
2) The coalition of the Legal Immigrant Association (LIA), and American Families United (AFU), has specific legislative language (SUPERVISORY REVIEW UPON REQUEST) that we are asking be included in the Commerce, Justice, and State appropriations bill that will be acted upon in this week or so. (LIA’s lobbyists will propose the language in Washington AFTER your meeting.)
3) ASK THAT YOUR MESSAGE BE PASSED ALONG TO THE LEGISLATIVE STAFF and let him/her know this is important to people in the Congressman's district.
4. If you cannot get a meeting AND you have others supporters would come to a meeting, ask to schedule a conference call. (When you call those people to ask them to be on a conference call with you and the Congressman's staff, they may call for a meeting themselves. Be flexible, and accept support when you get it.)

5. If all else fails and you have to do a phone call on your own, be sure to get the name of the staff person you speak with, and let Paul know who they are so Mr. Paul Donnelly (pauldonnelly@medialever.com) can follow up and make the connection between YOU in the district, and the legislation we want in Washington.
Legal Immigrant Association (LIA: www.legalimmigrant.org) is fighting for you; LIA’s lobbyists are fighting for you. LIA needs your support (donation is appreciated and much needed!! Please visit LIA’s website: www.legalimmigrant.org).
 
slncrusade

I am not in your target area, but I will email and call my friends to let them know what happens now and ask them to support LIA.
 
"Supervisory Review Upon Request" may improve Sen. Levin's amendment

LIA and LIA's lobbyists suggested the "Supervisory review upon request" which should be included into the bill to improve Sen. Levin’s amendment.

The following is the details.

Appendix: “Supervisory review upon request” to reduce FBI name check delay

Background Check Review Process--Legislative Language

SEC.___. PROCESSING OF BACKGROUND AND SECURITY CHECKS BY U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES—At the end of the Immigration Services and Infrastructure Improvements Act, Pub. L. 106-313, Title II (114 Stat. 1262, October 17, 2000), add the following—

“Sec. 205. Processing of Background and Security Checks.

“(a) With respect to the processing of background and security checks and fraud investigations conducted pursuant to any provision of law related to immigration benefits, the Secretary shall establish a procedure for supervisory review of delays in the concluding of such checks and investigations which shall:

“(1) Be available if the duration of the check or investigation has continued for longer than 180 days;

“(2) Be conducted if requested by a petitioner or applicant for any such immigration benefits;

“(3) Be conducted by supervisory personnel designated by the Secretary;

“(4) Determine the cause of the failure or inability to complete the check or investigation within 30 days of the request and project the likely time required to achieve completion;

“(5) Provide to the requesting petitioner or applicant the cause of the failure or inability to complete the check or investigation and the projected date of completion within 45 days of the request; and

“(6) Permit the petitioner or applicant to obtain a further supervisory review if the check or investigation remains pending after the projected date of completion.”

“(b) The Secretary shall publish a report within 90 days of the end of each fiscal year which shall itemize by type of immigration benefit sought:

“(1) The number of background and security checks and the number of fraud investigations (separately stated) that have been pending as of the end of such fiscal year for periods of 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, one year, two years, and more than two years; and

“(2) The numbers of supervisory reviews requested for each such type of immigration benefit and a statistical summary of the proportion of such checks and investigations completed within 30, 60, 90, and longer numbers of days after the request for supervisory review was filed.”
 
Top