Still in good status???

Bouki

Registered Users (C)
Hi guys,

I'm a little bit confused,when speaking of good status, does it deal with the limit date on the I-94,Visa entry or the national passport???

My cousin's B1/B2 visa was valid till marsh 2007. his I-94 was valid till july 2007, however his national passport is valid till now.

My question is:
Is he out of status or in good status?
I'm asking because he applied for asylum, he even had his interview ,and was given a mail-out-notice stating that his decision will be sent by mail, it also states that the mailing of his decision will not affect his eligibility to apply for EAD under bla bla bla......... .
Till then no decision from the AO, last week we called them, the same answer"No decision is made yet" otherwise"PENDING".

What a nightmare??????????????????????:rolleyes:

Thank you guys for replying us, we really appreciate your help.

Bouki Edmond
 
bouki, the best answer is,


send this petition letter to your US congressman/woman, ACLU, AILA and USCIS.


STEERING COMMITTEE ON ACTION-TRAVEL FREEDOM
[ADDRESS]
Mr. Eduardo Aguirre (no longer the one)
Director (with a rank of Under Secretary)
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”)
Department of Homeland Security
425 I Street, NW
Washington, DC 20536

Re: Petition to Seek Regulatory Change and Expedite the Processing of Applications for Refugee Travel Documents
Petition to Seek Regulatory Change and Expedite the Processing of asylum decision from asylum office.
Dear Director Aguirre:
Asylum applicant's are made to wait months or years just to get approval or rejection decision letter from asylum office and this is causing lots of pains and disappointments to many of the asylum applicants.
All asylum decisions should be issued within 2 weeks of interview, whether to be picked up at asylum office or mailed to applicant's mailing address.

We the undersigned are members and supporters of the Steering Committee on ACTION-Travel Freedom, a volunteer unincorporated association of current or previous asylees or refugees. By previous asylees or refugees, we are referring to those of us who have become permanent residents after having adjusted from a previous asylee or refugee status.

We sought the protection of the United States of America from regimes or societies that have persecuted us. We live in our adopted country, paying taxes, obeying its laws and contributing to its economic and social life. Pursuant to Section 223.2(b)(2) of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "CFR"), we are required to apply for and secure a Refugee Travel Document ("RTD") from the USCIS to travel outside the United States on business or for social occasions.

On numerous occasions, you have stated that the basic mission of the new USCIS is to ensure that "the right applicant receives the right benefit in the right amount of time, while preventing the wrong individuals from obtaining benefits." Currently, those of us who are in the aforedescribed class of current or former asylees or refugees have to encounter and deal with the following:
1. It is taking a minimum of six months for the USCIS to process RTDs.
2. Pursuant to 8 CFR 223.3(a)(2), RTDs are valid for only one year.
3. Pursuant to 8 CFR 223.2(c), we cannot apply for a new RTD while a currently valid RTD is in our possession.
4. A number of countries require that, in order to grant entry visas, RTDs should be valid for at least six months from the date of visa application.
The cumulative effect of the processing backlog and the provisions of the aforementioned regulations is that for at least six months out of every year, it is effectively and practically impossible for us to travel overseas. As current or previous asylees or refugees, we cannot apply for passports from the very governments that have persecuted us in the past. Such will be an unconscionable choice. Furthermore, such action may constitute a re-availment of the protection of those regimes, thereby threatening our legal status in the United States.

Due to the aforementioned backlog in RTD processing, we have been forced to forego a lot of business and professional opportunities that are essential in earning our livelihoods, when, as is usually the case in such an interdependent world and globalized economy, our work obligations require us to travel oversees. Furthermore, we have also missed numerous planned family and social events in safe third countries. This issue is particularly pertinent to us as we cannot travel to our respective countries of origin. One of the few occasions for our loved ones to meet and see us in person is to arrange for such meetings in safe countries. In general, we feel "imprisoned" in the most free nation on earth.

We believe that the current RTD processing backlog and the restrictive duration of validity of RTDs infringe on our due process and equal protection rights to travel and earn a livelihood, free from unreasonable restrictions, that have been afforded to all persons by the United States Constitution. We also believe that the current process violates the spirit, if not the letter, of Article 28.1 of the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (the "Refugee Convention"), as made applicable to the United States by its accession to the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

We ask you to use the powers of your good offices to effect the following two regulatory and administrative changes that will go a long way in mitigating our situation:

1. Amend 8 CFR 223.3(a)(2) to make RTDs valid for five years or more.
One of the reasons for the backlog is the fact that we have to apply for RTDs every year. On numerous occasions, you have promised to look at and reform such unnecessary and repetitive procedures that create even more backlogs. USCIS’s recent decision to amend 8 CFR 274a.12 by extending the duration of validity of documents evidencing employment authorization by up to five years is a good precedent which we ask the USCIS to follow with regards to RTDs. By way of comparison, for instance, Canadian equivalents of RTDs are issued for five years.
2. Eliminate backlogs and expedite the processing of RTDs within four weeks of application.

We believe that where there is a will, there is a way. As has been evidenced in some of the initiatives you undertook over the last year or so, it will not be an impossible task to set an efficient process that will ensure the turnover of RTD processing within a four week period. This timeline is even more achievable if the duration of validity of RTDs is extended as discussed above, thereby significantly reducing the backlog created by the current framework.
We will be more than happy to discuss these concerns in detail with you and/or your delegate(s). We look forward to hearing from your agency on this issue of immense importance to all of us.


Sincerely,

Steering Committee on ACTION-Travel Freedom
By Its Members:
Edit/Delete Message
Edit/Delete Message
 
Jonny,

This has nothing to do with the question he asked. If you do this kind of crap one more time, you will be banned.
 
Jonny,

This has nothing to do with the question he asked. If you do this kind of crap one more time, you will be banned.

He may mean well with his singular focus on this RTD validity period issue but the way he is expressing his desire is extremely annoying.
 
He may mean well with his singular focus on this RTD validity period issue but the way he is expressing his desire is extremely annoying.

and the annoying part is, he goes "the best answer is"...and his letter. Hello thats not the right answer...
 
what is crap when this petition seeks to decide all asylum decision within 2 weeks?

bouki's relative and my relative is in same situation . no asylum decision for long time from asylum office. if this petition is sent to concerned agencies or people, they will then knowour fraustation. i sent this petition to USCIS and my congress woman and she wrote me back a letter promising to look in this matter.

lots of people are also having problems with RTD, this petition seeks to change.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It sounds like.........

Dear Jonny1,mycgnow and Thankful.

I really appreciated the fact that you tried to answer my thread.
I'm not asking about any RTD, neither want to know the status of my cousin's application, they told us it's still pending.

The only question is to know if my cousin is still in status or out-of- status, that's it.His B1/B2 and non-immigrant I-94 are no longer valid, however his national passport is still valid.I told him they don't care about your NP, they mainly focus on the date written on your I-94 which is the limit date of his stay in this country,I don't know whom of us is right.

So could you please focus on the question we asked you guys???
Thanks God bless.

Please remember that he appied for asylum and was told that he can stay here till they make a decision on his behalf.
 
bouki, if your's cousin's I-94 is expired, then he is out of status, period! i-94 is the status in usa and if that status is no longer valid, your cousin is in illegal status.
your NP has nothing to do with his status in USA. neither any 5 or 10 year multiple entry visa stamped in passport.
so understand this.

my bro's status will be expiring in march and still waiting for asylum decision from AO, we think of applying for extension of his tourist visa while he awaits his asylum decision cos we never know whether he will get his asylum decision before the expiration of his visa or after his visa expires and become illegal. so, being in legal status is still better then being illegal immigrant.
 
Thank you Jonny1

Thanks Jonny1,
Now I understand.
But in the case of your brother, I'd advice you not to apply for any extension of his visa for fear of receiving an attempt do deny.
You said your brother will be out of status on the month of marsh 2008 right?
As far as I know if the AO denies him asylum, he'll certainly receive what they call an attempt to deny and will have 16 days to respond, this occurs when an asylum applicant has a valid satus.
So you understand that extending his visa can make things complicated if in case he is not granted asylum.
Anyway, certainly when he applied , the a-office sent him a notice stating that your complete I-589 has been received and is pending from this date xxx, it also says you can stay in the U.S untill your asylum is decided.

By the way, I'm not an attorney nor pretend to have more experience on this issue, maybe other peope on this forum will tell if I' am right or wrong.
Take care.
 
Top