Social Security - Daylight robbery...

Bhanu Kuchibhotla

Registered Users (C)
There was some discussion about Social Security tax on this board and I posting some info about this for the interested folks...

Bhanu

Taxes, but No Social Security for Indian H1-B Visa Holders
============================================
A few years ago Ajay Sehgal (not his real name), a young Indian high tech worker based in Connecticut, received a letter from the Social Security Administration.

The letter stated that through the six years that Sehgal lived and worked in the United States -- first on an H-1B visa and later while his greencard application was pending -- he had contributed approximately $50,000 in social security taxes.
Since he was unsure of whether his greencard petition would be approved, Sehgal thought he could cash in the $50,000 and return to India. So he approached his local social security office.
"It is my money after all," Sehgal said recently. "If they will not allow me to live in this country, if I cannot retire in this country, then they should allow me to take my money and return to India. Right?"
Wrong, said the local social security office. He was told that foreign employees (including those on H-1B visas) who may have worked in the America for a few years could claim social security benefits upon retirement, but this depends on the country of their origin.
In fact, Sethi later learned, as an Indian citizen on a temporary visa such as H-1B, he could not receive any social security retirement benefits -- even though he had legally paid his social security taxes.
"An Indian national on an H-1B visa is here for a period of six years," said Herb Loring, a social insurance program specialist with the SSA office in New York City. "And this person would get nothing. That is the law."
"But if this person came back and worked for four more years, under whatever status, and fulfilled the \'40-quarters\' exception rule, then this person could receive social security retirement benefits," Loring added. "Basically they cannot collect their money if they are an Indian national, unless they meet the exception."
The \'40-quarter\' exception rule, Loring explained, means that this person should have worked in the United States for at least 10 years. He added that this exception rule applies to citizens of over 30 countries who may have been employed in America for part of their career. The list of countries includes India, China, Afghanistan, Thailand, Kenya, Tunisia and Bangladesh, he said.
Loring added that workers from several Western European countries and Canada can claim social security benefits even if they worked in the United States for less than 10 years. The reason he said is the United States has treaties of reciprocity with these countries.
"The reciprocity rule in the treaties means that if a US citizen went to this other country and worked there for a few years under that country\'s retirement system, then the US citizen could also collect retirement benefits from that country," Loring said.
In addition, the United States also has \'totalization agreements\' with some countries, such as the United Kingdom, under which US nationals can receive retirement benefits based on their combined work history at home and in the other country.
But America has not signed any such treaty with India, Loring said. He suggested that the reason could be that India does not have a national retirement system similar to the United States and many other Western nations.
"I cannot comment on the question of fairness or unfairness," Loring said. "This is law in the United States."
But for workers like Ajay Sehgal the laws reek of discrimination, especially since the largest contingent of H-1B visa workers in the United States are from India and China.
"I call this daylight robbery," Sehgal fumed. "This rule has to be changed."
"Giving us a greencard or not giving us a greencard is your right. I fully appreciate it. But why do you rob us of our social security money?"
 
No Title

In US, I do not agree racism. This 40 point is not new, but started early days of Social security systems. SS system needs to change the rule, if the people ( whoever it may be ) are not eligible to get SS, they must at least get back their money. The rule has got inherit flaws that is actually aimed at citizens benefits and not at all temporary workers (H1). Or they should not detect SS tax from H1Bs. It seems people forced to go back before 40 points, due to H1, are being robbed and the money is given for others.
 
No Title

It may seem a highway robbery and even racism, but I think the key here is reciprocity. I myself am on H1B, pay all the taxes and hate it. My country (Russia) doesn\'t have an agreement with the US, so there\'s no way I can ever get anything back. I don\'t know what tax system India and China have but I do know that US nationals in Russia are subject to all Russian taxes that are way higher than here (can add up to 50-60% of your income). They also never get anything back. On one hand that brings me some comfort (I\'m not the only one being discriminated against) on the other hand it makes me wonder why not agree on something and give each other a break.
 
No Title

I agree with Bhanu & others , that Social security deduction is not justified for the temporary workers,I would like to bring another anamoly regarding the H1 status and college tution fees.I joined in college and has been asked asked to pay the non-state resident fees which is high compared to state resident fees.Even though I pay the state taxes regularly and lived in the state for 3 years, I will not get the resident fees, because H1 is non-resident alien.If I am not resident of the state why should I pay the state taxes?
 
No Title

At least ther is anomaly. If they do not pay the benefits because the other country does not reciprocate and they do not have treaty, on the same line they should not take away SS tax because other countries do not. Unfortunately here is the anomaly:
Will not give any benefit in line with other country as they do not provide such benefit.
However will take away tax and give benefit to my citizens from the hard earned money by others even though other country do not do such.
I would do whatever is beneficial to me and will show excuse to my benefit.
 
No Title

I agree with Ivy2000 on reciprocity. But the problem is that in many countries, such as China that does not have national retirement program and the government does not collect the taxes for it. Hence, none of the citizens in that country need to pay the tax that is similar to Social security tax here. Neither do foreigners who work in that country. It is fair. People do not pay tax; therefore they do not expect any benefits from the government.

However, things become so unfair in this country. The law in this country basically tells us to pay all the taxes and do not expect any benefits. If they emphasize reciprocity between countries, that is fine too, as long as they apply it equally. But the reality is that their citizens in many non-tax treaty countries do not need to pay the retirement tax because no such tax exists. We people need to pay it here and are told no benefits for us if they do not allow us to stay here. Moreover, we cannot get our own money back if we are forced to go back to native country. It is indeed a daylight robbery. We should try to make this law changed even after we get green card.
 
No Title

Do you get Social security benefits if one makes 40 credits for Social security and stay outside USA?
One may loose the GC if one stays outside USA for longer than 1 year..
 
No Title

Do they count all the money you paid in SS tax while on H1B if you get a GC? I hope they do otherwise I\'ll become violent brb!
 
No Title

That\'s strange...I took some classes in a nearby Community College after I switched to H1B and was charged in-state tuition. Which college was that that charged you out-of-state? Come to think of it, maybe that was because my company paid for it...I\'m not sure, but I think you may want to double check.
 
No Title

This is the reply for Posted By: ak1 regarding resident and non-resident. The resident and non-resident for college fees is based on the state income eligibility. Once you pay 1 year state tax, you should be billed on resident fees. Check your college records clearly. It is nothing to do with GC at all. The state funds for you if you compleet 1 year in that state tax from the tax money and that is why residents are getting less fees. Check your college, it is the common practice everywhere in USA.
 
No Title

Desktop,

It is not the case of a friend of mine. She is on H-4 visa and her family lived in the same state for more than three years. Of course they have paid state tax for three years. However she still pays non-resident fees which is triple the amount of resident fees for her college studying. She was told as long as they are on the visas and do not have CG, they are not counted as residents, no matter how long they have lived.

Maybe every school has its different rule to apply to different situation.
 
No Title

I checked with the college professor, who is incharge of the immigration matters, he said that NJ state does not consider it as a resident case.So I had to pay the fees.
 
Top