Settlement Agreement vs. HR 418

G

go2bk

Registered Users (C)
I am curious to know that if the Senate moves forward and approves HR 418, what would be our benefit out of the Settlement agreement?? Would the provision in HR 418 precedes the Settlement agreement, and hence the agreement becomes null and useless? Assuming the HR 418 is annuled, what would be the revised cut off date in the current fiscal year?

sorry if I sound fanticizing... :p

go2bk
 
am curious to know that if the Senate moves forward and approves HR 418, what would be our benefit out of the Settlement agreement?? Would the provision in HR 418 precedes the Settlement agreement, and hence the agreement becomes null and useless? Assuming the 10,000 cap is annuled, what would be the revised cut off date in the current fiscal year?

sorry if I sound fanticizing...

go2bk
 
I am assuming with the current backlog and how immigration processes applications..The cutoff date will be early 2002 if the cap is lifted..I am basing my judgement on the Refugee Adjustments being processed...which is at 2002 now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By my calculation around 50,000 asylees will get GC every year and there will be no backlog after 4 years by this rate.
 
wantmygcnow said:
I am assuming with the current backlog and how immigration processes applications..The cutoff date will be early 2002 if the cap is lifted..I am basing my judgement on the Refugee Adjustments being processed...which is at 2002 now.
Click to expand...


The White House promised a while back that its goal is for the INS to approve/deny all applications within 180 days of submission, assuming that the case is not subject to any legal quotas of course. Refugee adjustment would qualify. So would asylee adjustment if the cap were removed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top