Senate passes immigration laws. 1447(b)??

[rob waiter]

Was 1447(b) changed?
please advise!

 

[boston_case]

Was 1447(b) changed?
please advise!

Where did you get this information from ??

 

[rob waiter]

Was 1447(b) changed?
please advise!

was the following passed?

g) District Court Jurisdiction- Section 336(b) (8 U.S.C. 1447(b)) is amended to read as follows:

`(b) Request for Hearing Before District Court- If there is a failure to render a final administrative decision under section 335 before the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Homeland Security completes all examinations and interviews required under such section, the applicant may apply to the district court for the district in which the applicant resides for a hearing on the matter. The Secretary shall notify the applicant when such examinations and interviews have been completed. Such district court shall only have jurisdiction to review the basis for delay and remand the matter, with appropriate instructions, to the Secretary for the Secretary's determination on the application.'.

 

[rob waiter]

I did not know. I just checked CNN that they were
debating and passing S2611. I did not know
know the fate of 1447(b).
Maybe some gurus will provide more definite
answers.

Where did you get this information from ??

 

[Suzy977]

I did not know. I just checked CNN that they were
debating and passing S2611. I did not know
know the fate of 1447(b).
Maybe some gurus will provide more definite
answers.

What I knew about this subject is that the House of Representative passed the amendment but Senate never did.

I didn't hear anything new on the subject, I hope it's still not passed yet, and will never be.

 

[rob waiter]

What I knew about this subject is that the House of Representative passed the amendment but Senate never did.

I didn't hear anything new on the subject, I hope it's still not passed yet, and will never be.

suzy,

thanks for this information.

r

 

[FedoraCore]

1447(b)

no, in the senate version, 1447(b) is modified to read as follow

REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE DISTRICT
8 COURT.—If there is a failure to render a final administra9
tive decision under section 335 before the end of the 180-
day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary
of Homeland Security completes all examinations and
interviews required under such section, the applicant may
apply to the district court for the district in which the
applicant resides for a hearing on the matter. The Secretary shall notify the applicant when such examinations
and interviews have been completed. Such district court
shall only have jurisdiction to review the basis for delay
and remand the matter, with appropriate instructions, to
the Secretary for the Secretary’s determination on the application.’’.

So they totally killed it. "The secretary shall notify" is the key here, because he will tell ya when the examination is done. so it's impossible for you to determine when the examination and the interviews were completed. it is worse then the house bill when it comes to 1447(b). Notice also the seperation between the examination and the interview.

 

[rob waiter]

yes, I very much worry about this amendment.

no, in the senate version, 1447(b) is modified to read as follow

REQUEST FOR HEARING BEFORE DISTRICT
8 COURT.—If there is a failure to render a final administra9
tive decision under section 335 before the end of the 180-
day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary
of Homeland Security completes all examinations and
interviews required under such section, the applicant may
apply to the district court for the district in which the
applicant resides for a hearing on the matter. The Secretary shall notify the applicant when such examinations
and interviews have been completed. Such district court
shall only have jurisdiction to review the basis for delay
and remand the matter, with appropriate instructions, to
the Secretary for the Secretary’s determination on the application.’’.

So they totally killed it. "The secretary shall notify" is the key here, because he will tell ya when the examination is done. so it's impossible for you to determine when the examination and the interviews were completed. it is worse then the house bill when it comes to 1447(b). Notice also the seperation between the examination and the interview.

 

[NJGoose]

So they totally killed it.

I am confused. Did the Senate pass it, not pass it or are they still debating it? If they did, are there other ways to file a lawsuit?

 

[rob waiter]

seems nobody is sure. But it is very unfair and frustrating if a player is trying to
change the rules in the middle of the game!

I am confused. Did the Senate pass it, not pass it or are they still debating it? If they did, are there other ways to file a lawsuit?

 

[query11]

They dont have a problem legalizing all the people who broke the law but definitely have a problem naturalizing the law abiding people.

 

[Suzy977]

They dont have a problem legalizing all the people who broke the law but definitely have a problem naturalizing the law abiding people.

You'll be surprised to learn that criminals have more rights than law obeying people

Example: More than a year ago, a truck loaded with Mexican illegals was pursued by CHP on 5 Freeway from San Diego going North toward L.A.

The illegals were trowing pieces of metal (while the truck was cruising with over 70MPH.) on the CHP car. (we can call that attack with a deadly weapon )

Finally the Mexican truck broke down and the driver had to stop.

A smart ass from a helicopter filmed the taking in the custody of the illegals/criminal Mexicans. The officers put them on the ground, handcuffed them and apparently after being attacked with those dangerous metal pieces the adrenaline was still pumping through their veins and weren't gentle enough with the poor "CRIMINALS".

Well, the conclusion of the story: The officers penalized (I believe fired too ) and the illegals and criminals sued...for having their human rights broken

Real justice, ha