To Brian.
I am sorry for your misunderstanding of my extraordinary ability to predicts exctraordinary stupidity.
Of course I asked to put the information about my critical contribution into first author publications and inventions into recommendation letters from my collaborators. But they did not read these paragraphs at all.
Now I am following different strategy. I am getting very brief 2 paragraph letters from my high-titled co-authors with brief strait forward statement that I am " the one and only one".
Also their will be a lengthy statement from my immidiate superviser and co-author on most publications with similar stataments and confessions that I will quote in the cover letter.
Additionally there will be 5 or more 2-3 page letters from "independent" experts, mostly at assistant professor level, that had no collaboration or publications with me, but who know me from presentations, publications, discussions, etc.
The whole preparation of petition is such a waste of time and pain in the butt. Instead of thinking about experiments I am thinking how it is better to express that I am at the top of the field of my research.
It would make much more sense that either BCIS criteria will be more clear, or the lawyer would do all this work for you. But they want US to prepare all the important documents. This takes up most of the time from research.
Good example of better criteria is a point system. Like paper in the Nature - 100 points. In Journal of Experimental Medicine - 70 points. Life time award - 500 points. Best poster award 50 points. Something like that. If you accumulate 500 points total - no questions, no RFE, no lawyers. Enjoy your life in heaven. Get ready to retire.