- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-485 Issues
- I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers
- General I-485 and Related Issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
RFE issued
- Thread starter Kajol
- Start date
No Title
This is in reference to I-485 petition at VSC..
My wife is a Principal beneficiary..
After a year long wait INS requested RFE in my case about my old I-20 on June 8, \'01 and when our lawyer sent it, INS promptly reciprocated in it\'s message system of having updated that information on June 18, \'01.
In the mean time yesterday night when I called INS immigration #, to verify the status of my wife\'s I-485 case, it said " The letter of our intent to deny this case was mailed to you on June 14. If 14 days have passed.." etc..
We were shocked to hear such a strong statement, as:
a> If further documentation is required the message should\'ve said about RFE.
b> If my case issue was pending before making the final assessement, it should\'ve said so, as waiting for the further evidence..
We believe that it was a plain mistake to have such a message to play in our case, as neither of us are ever out-of-status, have received our second EAD/Ad. Parole this year, and my wife also had O-1 last year..
Has anyone has heard / gone through such a traumatic experience?
Any sightations are greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Obscure!
This is in reference to I-485 petition at VSC..
My wife is a Principal beneficiary..
After a year long wait INS requested RFE in my case about my old I-20 on June 8, \'01 and when our lawyer sent it, INS promptly reciprocated in it\'s message system of having updated that information on June 18, \'01.
In the mean time yesterday night when I called INS immigration #, to verify the status of my wife\'s I-485 case, it said " The letter of our intent to deny this case was mailed to you on June 14. If 14 days have passed.." etc..
We were shocked to hear such a strong statement, as:
a> If further documentation is required the message should\'ve said about RFE.
b> If my case issue was pending before making the final assessement, it should\'ve said so, as waiting for the further evidence..
We believe that it was a plain mistake to have such a message to play in our case, as neither of us are ever out-of-status, have received our second EAD/Ad. Parole this year, and my wife also had O-1 last year..
Has anyone has heard / gone through such a traumatic experience?
Any sightations are greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Obscure!