There is some kind of irony in the entire process -- rules changing so much with time, is really unjust to cope with.. I know some friends who applied for labor in 2003 November and got green card in EB-3 within 1 year, also from India.. That was when the new labors were approved ahead of the queue while years old LC applications were kept pending..And even at its core, the EB green card process itself would need you to be in the defined profession until as long as it takes to get the green card, but not after getting it ---
Packing bags and moving out is not all that simple. You may not be a slave in the once defined sense of the word towards africans in US, but taking decisions such as these to move out of a country -- when all else is going smoothly -- may be not out of one's choice completely. There are so many concerns over children who are in this atmosphere adjusting to a new country, its weather and etc.. So, even the free-birds like metaman who are talking about going back to India have this "adjust to the fate" and "take everything as it comes without questioning" built into them. Its not a free choice, and in a way that forces you to do things the way you wouldn't otherwise like to... call it with any other word if you choose, and not "slavery".
Slavery may not be the right word ofcourse. But there is no need to fight verbatim over the words, it is true that the recent change is hightly unexpected for people from India, to drag the dates all the way back to 1998 for EB-3 and 1999 for even EB-2 which was only rumoured to retrogress a year or so earlier, if at all.
If not slavery, this might actually mean gambling with ones future without any clue as to how it would turn the next time around. People are rightlfully expressing their frustration about such sweeping changes.. There is no way one could simply accept these policy changes as normal, for that one has to be a true gambler or day trader who plays with his life's choices all the time, not just an IT professional.
Packing bags and moving out is not all that simple. You may not be a slave in the once defined sense of the word towards africans in US, but taking decisions such as these to move out of a country -- when all else is going smoothly -- may be not out of one's choice completely. There are so many concerns over children who are in this atmosphere adjusting to a new country, its weather and etc.. So, even the free-birds like metaman who are talking about going back to India have this "adjust to the fate" and "take everything as it comes without questioning" built into them. Its not a free choice, and in a way that forces you to do things the way you wouldn't otherwise like to... call it with any other word if you choose, and not "slavery".
Slavery may not be the right word ofcourse. But there is no need to fight verbatim over the words, it is true that the recent change is hightly unexpected for people from India, to drag the dates all the way back to 1998 for EB-3 and 1999 for even EB-2 which was only rumoured to retrogress a year or so earlier, if at all.
If not slavery, this might actually mean gambling with ones future without any clue as to how it would turn the next time around. People are rightlfully expressing their frustration about such sweeping changes.. There is no way one could simply accept these policy changes as normal, for that one has to be a true gambler or day trader who plays with his life's choices all the time, not just an IT professional.