GCChaahiye
Registered Users (C)
Hi,
I am thinking of applying for GC under NIW cateogry.I have hired an attorney and they have sent me sample recommendation letters.But I find them to be very very strongly worded and I sincerely doubt if any referees would agree to give such letters based on my current work.
I know independent reference letters are important for this category.However,how important are they?Is the decision of the BCIS based on the STRENGTH AND NUMBER of references?
Though I have some publications and am working on a very important disease,I am finding it next to impossible to imagine getting these recommendation letters.This is because,I have not yet achieved anything "absolutely ground breaking".Hence,I am unable to point out anything "standing out" in my CV and my career.I am unable to think what highlights should I point out for the referees who are obviously highly accomplished scientists.Whatever I might have achieved at my level of experience, may not be worth a dime in the eyes of the referees.
Hence, I am not having the guts to even approach any referees to request the letters.
I am very concerned if I would be able to get any letters.
Would appreciate any help and advice.
Thanks
GC
I am thinking of applying for GC under NIW cateogry.I have hired an attorney and they have sent me sample recommendation letters.But I find them to be very very strongly worded and I sincerely doubt if any referees would agree to give such letters based on my current work.
I know independent reference letters are important for this category.However,how important are they?Is the decision of the BCIS based on the STRENGTH AND NUMBER of references?
Though I have some publications and am working on a very important disease,I am finding it next to impossible to imagine getting these recommendation letters.This is because,I have not yet achieved anything "absolutely ground breaking".Hence,I am unable to point out anything "standing out" in my CV and my career.I am unable to think what highlights should I point out for the referees who are obviously highly accomplished scientists.Whatever I might have achieved at my level of experience, may not be worth a dime in the eyes of the referees.
Hence, I am not having the guts to even approach any referees to request the letters.
I am very concerned if I would be able to get any letters.
Would appreciate any help and advice.
Thanks
GC
Last edited by a moderator: