Agreed with your thoughts, but how far can common sense go...
JoeF,
I agree with what you say...
However, there got to be some rule somewhere; otherwise it is too much power on one INS officer at the POE.
So, considering the same example as above, even with the following things
- The person works for a US company
- The person is on a temporary assignment abroad, and has a letter from company saying that
- Pays taxes as US resdient
- Maintains bank accounts and credi cards
- Does NOT have a house or apartment here (since wants to save some money)
- Does have all household stuff in storage
- Does NOT have family member here (wife is with the person abroad - since if wife is not working, what is she going to do here anyway)
Now after all this, could one INS officer consider this to be good enough proof that the person always intends to stay in the US; and the other INS office consider this as not valid - and doesnot let the person enter the US?
Common sense to me says that the person shouldnot have any problem, since he has a clear case - however if completely left to the INS officer, can\'t one INS officer interpret this as valid enough reasons; and other say no...
If that is so, then isn\'t there something very wrong with the whole POE process?