RD: August 2003

glb

Registered Users (C)
Dear Freinds,

One of my colleague got his green card yesterday in Hartford, CT. We are about 6 employees from same company who have applied for the green card at the same time.

Only this colleague's case was transfered to Hartford, CT. After 5 months our attorney received his interview date letter. He received this letter only one day before.

I am confused why only his case was transfered? Any thoughts?

RD: 08/29/2003
ND: 09/14/2003
FP: 10/24/2003

sz.
 
Folks,

I am not that dum you think. He works with me in the same company. Our RD is 08/29/2003. He got his passport stamped at Harford. He was told to expect his green card (plastic card) within six weeks.

SZ.
 
He recently got married (a year ago) and do not have any kids.

I don't understand what case ageout means. Could you please explain.
 
I am sorry, yes I accept I am dumm poor fellow. it is 2002 not 2003. Sorry folks the mistake.

RD: 08/29/2002
ND: 09/14/2002
FP: 10/24/2002
 
Mine is also 8/29/2002
But no luck yet.

Can someone please verify any August approvals so far.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My friend -July RD got RFE

Hi All,
On this note, I would like to share one of my friends case.
He got RFE recently.

His 485 case details
RD: July3,2002
ND: July12,2002
RFE: Employer letter and Date of birth.
 
GOOD

I am extremely happy to see July and August approvals. That means October is not far away for this crazy BCIS. I know that there are still a lot of people with earlier RD but what can any one do about that ? It's just a fate here.
 
Possible reasons for Transfer

There are no specific reasons for transfers. However, based upon posts on various Internet forums, the following is observed so far as likely factors to trigger a transfer/interview (though applicability of any of the following doesn't necessarily guarantee a transfer):

1. Random "quality check" (meaning no specific reasons for transfer)

2. Married after filing I-485 (mostly to verify bona fide marriage)

3. Change of employer, residence, jurisdiction (mostly to verify AC21 related issues)

4. Positive for HIV, TB, during medical testing (mostly to verify continuing treatment)

5. National Interest Waiver based I-140 (mostly to verify if the applicant still works in the same area of national interest as argued in the pre-approved immigration petition)

6. Few EB-1 EA/OR based I-140 (mostly to check "public charge" information, meaning to verify financial self-reliability and if the employment is of EA or OR nature)

7. Not-readablity of two consecutive fingerprinting (mostly to collect police clearances)

8. "Hit" on fingerprinting (meaning if criminal record exists)

9. Applicants from countires that required special registration sometime ago

10. Non-conclusive or incomplete response to the RFE if any

The order in above list is just random and doesn't signify any hierarchy, and by no means is claimed to be complete.

Best wishes,

Jigesh

Disclaimer: Personal non-legal point of view only.


Excellent list -- jigesh
I found following from I-485 Standard Operating Procedure for a likely interview:

On a case-by-case basis, an officer may choose to relocate an I-485 for interview if he/she deems it necessary. Applications require a relocation if the officer determines:

* a need for validation for identity
* a need for validation of legal status
* questionable admissability and/or qualifications
* apparent fraud
* a second filing
* an applicant with fingerprinting rejected twice
* an applicant with medical conditions class A or B
* the A-file cannot be located at the time of adjudication

Lowell
 
Hi Jigesh,

You may be right, as this person is from special registration and country. Now I am leaning towards this becuase only his case was transferred to local office but NOT his wife's. I think Special Registration country would make more sense now.

Anyway, I hope all our cases are approved pretty soon.

Thanks,

SZ.
 
Top