Question regarding changing employer

ben2000

Registered Users (C)
Did you guys inform INS when you changed your employers? This is what I got from Murthy.com. Any comment?

Question One : Is it necessary to notify INS if one is changing jobs based on AC21?

Answer : It is usually safest to notify the INS so that the INS file
will have a record of the change of employer, assuming that the case is approved and there is a clear basis established for the approval. This may avoid problems several years down the road when one is ready to file for U.S. citizenship. It avoids any allegations of fraud or misrepresentation if one did not work for the original green card-sponsoring employer after receiving the green card approval. The June 2001 INS Interim Guidance Memo also recommends and suggests that the INS expects that they will be notified upon a person's changing employers under AC21
portability provisions.

EDITORIAL COMMENTS : AC21 does not contain any specific type of filing required for INS notification regarding the change in jobs. It does not mandate informing the INS. The June 2001 INS guidance on the subject states that it is expected that the INS will be notified regarding this matter.

In some cases, the INS will issue a request for evidence, requiring an updated employment letter and pay stubs. In such cases, there is no choice but to notify the INS of the change in employers. The percentage of cases receiving such requests has varied significantly over time.

Informing the INS regarding AC21 job changes is an issue over which attorneys will have differing opinions. Since law does not mandate it, it is ultimately a strategy issue.

It is generally safer to inform the INS regarding the use of AC21, if applicable. The reasoning is that informing the INS creates a complete and clear record of the basis upon which the case was decided. Assuming an approval, this may avoid issues that will be important in citizenship cases, five years later. When an individual who obtained permanent residence through employment applies for U.S. citizenship, the question arises regarding the length of time the individual worked for the LC-sponsoring employer following receipt of the green card. With non-AC21
cases, the failure to work for the sponsoring employer for a reasonable time raises issues of fraud or misrepresentation in connection with the green card application. The entire case is based upon an offer of employment and the promise to accept that employment. With AC21 cases, the promise regarding future employment is essentially "switched" to a different employer as long as the new job is in the "same or similar" field. However, if the INS has not been notified of the change in employers
under AC21, then there is no record. This could cause problems and confusion at the naturalization stage, which are best avoided by informing the INS when appropriate.
 
Murthy is "THE" authority and what she is saying must be right.
here are my thoughts
- No regulations yet.....
- AC21 contradiction

AC21 is designed to let an applicant change jobs after 180 days, and I have read her comments saying that its ok to change after 180 days

chat dated 12/09/2002
Chat User : What if an employee is laid off before completing 180 days after filing the I-485 and has an I-140 pending? Can the employee change employers and still preserve the AOS?

Attorney Murthy : If the employer revokes the underlying I-140 petition and the INS acts on that revocation within the 180 days then the INS may terminate the case. The way AC21 law is written, the employee can gain approval of the AOS, as long as it is the "same or similar" job as long as the I-485 remains unadjudicated for 180 days. The issue pertaining to the need to work for the LC sponsor during the initial 180 days has not yet been set forth in regulations, as the regulations still have not been issued.

So in this case naturalization should not be possible.

most people on this board think of changing employer 180 days after RD then there are cases in which a person does not have much choice, what if the employer is going under... in such cases you might be inviting trouble

and most of them will get through naturalization process, they might have to pay extra time to the lawyers to iron out the creases
 
Top