- Home
- Forums
- Immigrant Visas (Green Cards)
- I-485 Issues
- I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers
- General I-485 and Related Issues
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Project Ocean 9A: Request Don Neufeld to disclose high Level Plan to reduce backlog
- Thread starter Dadagiri
- Start date
Re: Project Ocean 9A: Request Don Neufeld to disclose high Level Plan to reduce backl
Thanks for your taking the initiative.
I don't think Don Neufeld will reply to our request.
Instead of that, how about proposing him to abolish the standard operation procedure
that if an I-485 has been pending for more than one year, a RFE (Request for Evidence) must be sent out to confirm that the applicant is still employed with the sponsoring organization.
Hi, Dadagiri,Originally posted by Dadagiri
I will post a letter shortly. This is to request Mr Neufeld to disclose a highlevel plan as to how he is going to reduce backlog to 1 year by september 2004 as he had promised
Thanks for your taking the initiative.
I don't think Don Neufeld will reply to our request.
Instead of that, how about proposing him to abolish the standard operation procedure
that if an I-485 has been pending for more than one year, a RFE (Request for Evidence) must be sent out to confirm that the applicant is still employed with the sponsoring organization.
Kashmir ur observation is correct
but i think so Rajiv pointed out earlier that GC is based on JOB it is unreasonable to get rid of this request. the only thing is that we need GC in 1 year before sep 2004 what ever it takes
they need to hire more people to handle RFE and FP
thats why i am requesting high level plan....
i know he wont give but atleast atleast he can give update in liason meeting... as to what is the plan... we dont want merely processing of cases we want adjudications
if CSC says we are processing it may mean they have send out RFE's or transferred but that is not helping us
but i think so Rajiv pointed out earlier that GC is based on JOB it is unreasonable to get rid of this request. the only thing is that we need GC in 1 year before sep 2004 what ever it takes
they need to hire more people to handle RFE and FP
thats why i am requesting high level plan....
i know he wont give but atleast atleast he can give update in liason meeting... as to what is the plan... we dont want merely processing of cases we want adjudications
if CSC says we are processing it may mean they have send out RFE's or transferred but that is not helping us
Kashmir ,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instead of that, how about proposing him to abolish the standard operation procedure
that if an I-485 has been pending for more than one year, a RFE (Request for Evidence) must be sent out to confirm that the applicant is still employed with the sponsoring organization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What if the applicant has changed the employer pursuant to AC21. I think it should be purely employment despite his/her designation.
Gcworthy
WAC-02-103-xxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instead of that, how about proposing him to abolish the standard operation procedure
that if an I-485 has been pending for more than one year, a RFE (Request for Evidence) must be sent out to confirm that the applicant is still employed with the sponsoring organization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
What if the applicant has changed the employer pursuant to AC21. I think it should be purely employment despite his/her designation.
Gcworthy
WAC-02-103-xxxxx