wantmygcnow
Volunteer Moderator
Per my laywer..subtract 18 months from the timeframe...
Processing Dates - Timeframe changed
- Thread starter nofreedom
- Start date
Re: Re: Processing Dates - Timeframe changed
Agree
Maybe they will start taking away new GC and next FY will start from Feb 2 1999 
This just adds up to our confusion. Who is in charge to update these information? Nebraska Office? Maybe that is the reason they took away direct phone to Nebraska Office?? As shamshon said, Bunch of Incompetent Idiot Sickos. It is like working in the warehouse and not knowing that you have to ship orders, because nobody informed you. You would probably get fired. And we are talking here about THE BCIS, the homeland security agency that knows everything. This tells you how competent they are ... anyway, enough said about them.
We need more opinion on this topic. Any new approvals?? Ideas?? Informations??
Agree
Maybe they will start taking away new GC and next FY will start from Feb 2 1999 This just adds up to our confusion. Who is in charge to update these information? Nebraska Office? Maybe that is the reason they took away direct phone to Nebraska Office?? As shamshon said, Bunch of Incompetent Idiot Sickos. It is like working in the warehouse and not knowing that you have to ship orders, because nobody informed you. You would probably get fired. And we are talking here about THE BCIS, the homeland security agency that knows everything. This tells you how competent they are ... anyway, enough said about them. We need more opinion on this topic. Any new approvals?? Ideas?? Informations??
nofreedom, this might not make u feel better, but is worth reading
http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/AILA Backgrounder 1-800 Customer Disservice.pdf
http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/AILA Backgrounder 1-800 Customer Disservice.pdf
Your lawyer is absolutely right, they cannot do that, period. We have been over and over this several times. BCIS has no authority to do such a thing, period.
As for the processing timeframe, they report to be processing applications filed on or before 16 Nov. That's a good new we discussed already like 15 days ago.
As for the other part of the timeframe, it is incongruent because simply they havent updated that yet, why? because they are running out of time, only one month left fot the current FY.
kelvin2088
Registered Users (C)
Re: right
I don't know why ur always that pessimistic??
So what auction should be taken??
I don't know why ur always that pessimistic??
So what auction should be taken??
Re: Re: Re: Processing Dates - Timeframe changed
On a second thought, I think the accurate interpretation of BCIS is as follows: Bunch of Creepy Idiotic Sickos
Originally posted by nofreedom
Agree
We need more opinion on this topic. Any new approvals?? Ideas?? Informations??
On a second thought, I think the accurate interpretation of BCIS is as follows: Bunch of Creepy Idiotic Sickos
Re: Re: right
There is absolutely no pessimism in Gilbert's statement. It is only a clear explanation of the facts regarding this issue.
You can candidly wait for the unused visas to be issued, but the fact is BCIS is taking no action on that.
BCIS is just doing their work like human beings they are; not an excelent work, no the worst neither.
Only way to recover the unused visas is via Congress and we know how difficult that is. Maybe the most difficult part of that process belongs to us, and that is to be organized and stay together.
There is absolutely no pessimism in Gilbert's statement. It is only a clear explanation of the facts regarding this issue.
You can candidly wait for the unused visas to be issued, but the fact is BCIS is taking no action on that.
BCIS is just doing their work like human beings they are; not an excelent work, no the worst neither.
Only way to recover the unused visas is via Congress and we know how difficult that is. Maybe the most difficult part of that process belongs to us, and that is to be organized and stay together.
Re: Re: right
That is not being pessimistic at all. That is being realistic.
We all come from places where dictatorship prevail. However, this country is under something we call the "RULE OF LAW". Officials cannot act beyond power provided by law. The law says in plain English that only 10000 asylees can adjust EVERY FISCAL YEAR. This limit cannot be exceeded, period.
That is not being pessimistic at all. That is being realistic.
We all come from places where dictatorship prevail. However, this country is under something we call the "RULE OF LAW". Officials cannot act beyond power provided by law. The law says in plain English that only 10000 asylees can adjust EVERY FISCAL YEAR. This limit cannot be exceeded, period.
rik-tik-tak
Registered Users (C)
I am sorry about this. On a second look:
Received Date: November 12, 1999
Notice Date: December 3, 1999
question for rik-tik-tak,
I am confused by your last posting. The dates that you wrote down
Received Date: November 12, 1999
Notice Date: December 3, 1999
Are these your case dates? I know for a fact that you were approved some time last month. If these are your dates, then it is clear that the BCIS is keeping its word for the cutoff date November 16, 1999. Please clarify your answer.
I am confused by your last posting. The dates that you wrote down
Received Date: November 12, 1999
Notice Date: December 3, 1999
Are these your case dates? I know for a fact that you were approved some time last month. If these are your dates, then it is clear that the BCIS is keeping its word for the cutoff date November 16, 1999. Please clarify your answer.