Dear all, my credentials are: 7 letters; 15 papers and 3 international proceedings (My name is on the first place on only 2 of papers); review 30 articles for one journal. So my lawyer claimed (1) original contributions; (2) authorship and (3) judge of other work. Now i got RFE from TSC.
The points of RFE are like these:
(1) in 7 letters, the writers didn't say my contributions are rated as top 1 or top2. So they asked me to submit further evidence or the major contributions i have made to my field. Also they asked these questions: Have others emulated your style and techniques? Have others gained national or international renown in this field based on skills you taught them? Have you made major contributions to this field in any other ways? Please explain and provide clear documentary proof in support of your response.
(2) about my authorship
Evidence was submitted that you have published, or contributed to the publication of, several scientific articles in major trade publications. Publication is part of the education process for a PhD. The number of articles published was considered extraordinary by the individuals who wrote your letters of recommendation. However, the evidence shows you are the first author on only 2 articles. Normally, aliens of extraordinary ability will be the first author on many ariticles with major significance. Please submit further evidence of your authorship (first author) of scientific publications in major trade publications.
(3) Evidence was submitted that the alien has been requested to review 29 different documents for suitability for publication. No evidence was submitted that the alien actually reviewed the documents.
Please submit further evidence that you have judged or critiqued the work of others in your field. Explain how this work was outside the scope of your usual duties, describe the significance of the work you judged or critiqued, the significance of the contributions mad eby those whose work you judged or critiqued, and describe your own experience in judging or critiquing the work of others in your field. Please submit coumentary evidence in support of your response.
Any suggestions? Thank you very much.
The points of RFE are like these:
(1) in 7 letters, the writers didn't say my contributions are rated as top 1 or top2. So they asked me to submit further evidence or the major contributions i have made to my field. Also they asked these questions: Have others emulated your style and techniques? Have others gained national or international renown in this field based on skills you taught them? Have you made major contributions to this field in any other ways? Please explain and provide clear documentary proof in support of your response.
(2) about my authorship
Evidence was submitted that you have published, or contributed to the publication of, several scientific articles in major trade publications. Publication is part of the education process for a PhD. The number of articles published was considered extraordinary by the individuals who wrote your letters of recommendation. However, the evidence shows you are the first author on only 2 articles. Normally, aliens of extraordinary ability will be the first author on many ariticles with major significance. Please submit further evidence of your authorship (first author) of scientific publications in major trade publications.
(3) Evidence was submitted that the alien has been requested to review 29 different documents for suitability for publication. No evidence was submitted that the alien actually reviewed the documents.
Please submit further evidence that you have judged or critiqued the work of others in your field. Explain how this work was outside the scope of your usual duties, describe the significance of the work you judged or critiqued, the significance of the contributions mad eby those whose work you judged or critiqued, and describe your own experience in judging or critiquing the work of others in your field. Please submit coumentary evidence in support of your response.
Any suggestions? Thank you very much.
