Nov. 2006 Vb Is Out

we are back to where we were -EB2 India.
Assume the movement for 6 months at this rate, then we see some light at the far end.
 
good_y said:
we are back to where we were -EB2 India.
Assume the movement for 6 months at this rate, then we see some light at the far end.

Yes wa are. Roughly around July 2007 our date might become current if the same rate of advancement is there. Cross my fingers. Before that something should come up with our EB-1 I-140. Atleast this time 6 months movement is there. We should not get surprise in the coming months the date "GOING BACKWARDS".
 
madgu-gc2005 said:
Yes wa are. Roughly around July 2007 our date might become current if the same rate of advancement is there. Cross my fingers. Before that something should come up with our EB-1 I-140. Atleast this time 6 months movement is there. We should not get surprise in the coming months the date "GOING BACKWARDS".

FYI
immigration law posted this prediction

Cut-off date movements in recent months have been greater than might ordinarily be expected, in an effort to maximize number use within the annual numerical limits. This has been necessary because demand being received from Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Offices for adjustment of status cases has been relatively light. As these dates have advanced, however, many thousands of applicants have become eligible for processing at CIS Offices. Once number use increases significantly as CIS addresses its backlog, cut-off date movement will necessarily slow or stop. Moreover, in some categories cut-off date retrogression is a particular possibility.
 
eb1doc said:
FYI
immigration law posted this prediction

Cut-off date movements in recent months have been greater than might ordinarily be expected, in an effort to maximize number use within the annual numerical limits. This has been necessary because demand being received from Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Offices for adjustment of status cases has been relatively light. As these dates have advanced, however, many thousands of applicants have become eligible for processing at CIS Offices. Once number use increases significantly as CIS addresses its backlog, cut-off date movement will necessarily slow or stop. Moreover, in some categories cut-off date retrogression is a particular possibility.


Does it mean EB1 will be retrogressed again soon?
 
eb1doc said:
FYI
immigration law posted this prediction

Cut-off date movements in recent months have been greater than might ordinarily be expected, in an effort to maximize number use within the annual numerical limits. This has been necessary because demand being received from Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) Offices for adjustment of status cases has been relatively light. As these dates have advanced, however, many thousands of applicants have become eligible for processing at CIS Offices. Once number use increases significantly as CIS addresses its backlog, cut-off date movement will necessarily slow or stop. Moreover, in some categories cut-off date retrogression is a particular possibility.

Yes I know eb1doc. I am NOT positive about my date (EB-2) become current by next year July 2007.

Thanks
 
eb1a-query said:
Does it mean EB1 will be retrogressed again soon?
i am worried abt eb2 moving sluggish.
I will not be surprise if country wise anything happens for eb1 post jan 2007
 
Top