Notice of Intent to Deny - 245(i)

Need of 245(i)

I think 245(i) (when done before April 30,2001 or was it August 2001??) applies only to the primary applicant if he had ever been out of status. As far as the spouse is concerned, since she is a "derivate applicant" the law does not have those constraints. In other words even if the spouse had been out of status or had worked without authorization, he/she is eligible for "Adjustment of status".

Look at the following list I picked up from USCIS website about a derivative applicant's eligibility. (http://uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/lpreligibility.htm)

Otherwise Eligible Immediate Relatives

If "otherwise eligible" to immigrate to the U.S., immediate relatives may adjust status to LPR (get a "green card") in the United States even if they may have done any of the following:

worked without permission,

remained in the U.S. past the period of lawful admission (e.g., past the expiration date on your I-94) and filed for adjustment of status while in an unlawful status because of that,

failed otherwise to maintain lawful status and with the proper immigration documentation, or

have been admitted as a visitor without a visa under sections 212(l) or 217 of the Act (which are the 15-day admission under the Guam visa waiver program and the 90-day admission under the Visa Waiver Program, respectively).

Please note: If a person came into the U.S. illegally, that person is barred from adjusting their status to LPR (cannot obtain a green card) even if he or she marries a U.S. citizen or otherwise becomes an immediate relative. An immediate relative must meet the eligibility requirement of being “inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States.”
 
ramss said:
I think 245(i) (when done before April 30,2001 or was it August 2001??) applies only to the primary applicant if he had ever been out of status. As far as the spouse is concerned, since she is a "derivate applicant" the law does not have those constraints. In other words even if the spouse had been out of status or had worked without authorization, he/she is eligible for "Adjustment of status".

Look at the following list I picked up from USCIS website about a derivative applicant's eligibility. (http://uscis.gov/graphics/howdoi/lpreligibility.htm)

Otherwise Eligible Immediate Relatives

If "otherwise eligible" to immigrate to the U.S., immediate relatives may adjust status to LPR (get a "green card") in the United States even if they may have done any of the following:

worked without permission,

remained in the U.S. past the period of lawful admission (e.g., past the expiration date on your I-94) and filed for adjustment of status while in an unlawful status because of that,

failed otherwise to maintain lawful status and with the proper immigration documentation, or

have been admitted as a visitor without a visa under sections 212(l) or 217 of the Act (which are the 15-day admission under the Guam visa waiver program and the 90-day admission under the Visa Waiver Program, respectively).

Please note: If a person came into the U.S. illegally, that person is barred from adjusting their status to LPR (cannot obtain a green card) even if he or she marries a U.S. citizen or otherwise becomes an immediate relative. An immediate relative must meet the eligibility requirement of being “inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States.”

The immediate Relative category you are referring here is immediate relative of US citizen. It is not available for Employment based categories.
 
ramss, I don't completely agree with you on the following:

==============================================
I think 245(i) (when done before April 30,2001 or was it August 2001??) applies only to the primary applicant if he had ever been out of status. As far as the spouse is concerned, since she is a "derivate applicant" the law does not have those constraints. In other words even if the spouse had been out of status or had worked without authorization, he/she is eligible for "Adjustment of status".
==============================================

I'm a derivative applicant for 485 and yet I received the NoID. It's possible you are right, that the NoID was sent by error, but I doubt that the derivative is immune from the rules governing 245.
 
tammy2 said:
The immediate Relative category you are referring here is immediate relative of US citizen. It is not available for Employment based categories.

No tammy. It is applicable to both a LPR(Lawful Permanent Resident) or a US citizen. (Follow the URL I sent and look at the beginning of the article). Also a derivative person applying along with the primary applicant is considered to be the same where a person is applying for adjustment of status with a immigration petition when the spouse is already a LPR.
 
mavishka said:
ramss, I don't completely agree with you on the following:

==============================================
I think 245(i) (when done before April 30,2001 or was it August 2001??) applies only to the primary applicant if he had ever been out of status. As far as the spouse is concerned, since she is a "derivate applicant" the law does not have those constraints. In other words even if the spouse had been out of status or had worked without authorization, he/she is eligible for "Adjustment of status".
==============================================

I'm a derivative applicant for 485 and yet I received the NoID. It's possible you are right, that the NoID was sent by error, but I doubt that the derivative is immune from the rules governing 245.

I hope you clear it through without problems. What is your spouse's status? Has she/he already been cleared or still waiting for adjudication?
 
mavishka said:
Both my spouse and I are waiting.

Is yours a AC21 case? In that case did you notify USCIS when your spouse changed the job? Also were you on a H4 or were you working when you applied for Adjustment of Status?

I am just trying to figure out a pattern here....

Thanks
 
ramss said:
Is yours a AC21 case? In that case did you notify USCIS when your spouse changed the job? Also were you on a H4 or were you working when you applied for Adjustment of Status?

I am just trying to figure out a pattern here....

Thanks

ramss, there's no point trying to figure out a pattern with the CIS. There's little or no correlation between anything they say or do. Yes, ours is an AC21 case.
 
mavishka said:
ramss, there's no point trying to figure out a pattern with the CIS. There's little or no correlation between anything they say or do. Yes, ours is an AC21 case.

I agree with you. But what I am trying to figure out is what others can follow. If we find that in most of the cases where a person has told CIS that he has changed job and that results in more queries, then a person can try and avoid and not notify CIS at all. That is what I was trying to do. Please do not misunderstand me and I fully understand your frustration. But can you tell us if you notified CIS?

Thanks
 
Top