Non Compete Agreements: California

non-compete

Registered Users (C)
Hi,

I know that a lot of us here who subscribe to this forum work for consuting companies with crazy rules and laws. I request you to help me out with my situation. It probably could help many others here as well. I know i cannot expect legal advice here, but pls chime in your experience/suggestions/advice/tips/stories if you have been through this or can share your experience.

I have been working for a software consulting company (Company A) in california for the last 4 years and have been deputed at their client's (Company B) site in california for the same period. Company A made me sign an agreement before I came to USA and this agreement consists of a non-compete clause as follows

"You agree that during or within a period of one year after completion of services provided under the terms of this agreement you shall not accept any offer of employment from any Company A's customer or the customer's end-user customer(in the case of a consulting or placement organization) with which you may have come in contact as a result of this agreement, whether such employment be on a part time, full time, independent contractor, or any other basis, without the written consent of Company A."

I quit Company A and have given them a notice period of 6 weeks till Nov 30, 2005 to join (Company C) a competitor of Customer B. I am quitting because there is no change to my financial condition and career for the last 4 years and things are getting worse as Company A takes away 60% of my earnings leaving me with nothing much to save. Responsbilities grow, bills creep up, cost of living increases, but salary remains same.

Company A and B have similar agreements between each other so as to not hire each other's employees. Company B has invested a lot of time and money in my training and knowledge, so they dont wish to lose me to their competitor. They also have much to lose with the project with very critical deadlines as i am a very experienced person on the team and have been on this project from the start.

So, In the interest of the success of the project and to avoid losses, Company B decided to take the risk and hire me as an independent contractor and is willing to face legal issues from Company A(not on my behalf though). Company B also countered the offer from Company C and i have accepted Company B's offer to work as an independent contractor.

I know non-compete agreements are void in california and cannot be enforceable in the court of law, so I would like to know what my exposure is and what Company A can do to prevent me from joining Company B. I also know that employers use non-compete clauses to protect their business, but this looks more like a punishment for quitting company A. Company A has many clients/customers here in the bay area who have a lot of end user customers. If they enforce the clause it means i cannot join most of the companies here in the bay area which specializes in my field of expertise thus restricting my employment oppurtunities and the right to earn a living. Pls chime in your experience if you have been thru this or if you know someone who has been through this.

If it helps to know, i have my EAD (family based) and i have a sole proprietership. Thanks for your time and appreciate your help with this and apologies for the lengthy post.
 
JoeF said:
Non-competes are not quite invalid in CA. Unreasonable non-competes are invalid here. In particular, if a non-compete prevents you from working in your field, it needs to be accompanied by appropriate compensation. In other words, the company would have to pay you the equivalent of what you could make as salary in the industry. A non-compete can not be designed in a way to rob you of the ability to earn money in your field or to cut off youre career.
I suggest you talk with a lawyer specializing in labor law.

Hi JoeF, Thanks for your reply.

The lawyers i spoke to think this case is weak and Company A has no chance of winning if they take me to court. But still, nothing stops them from taking me to court just to set an example for other consultants still working for them.

I agree the non-compete agreement is too broad, restrictive and it looks more like a punishment to the employee rather than protecting the employer's business. I dont know what the courts look for as 'independent consideration' but in my case, i was offered this job to work for their US branch (i got nothing else in return for signing the agreement).

I guess there is no other choice for me except to wait and watch. Chances of them taking me to court are 50-50. They could either choose to do nothing or go to court and waste their time and money. I know the management at Company A is stupid, but i dont think they are paying their lawyers $500 an hour to be stupid.

something i found online...
http://www.murthy.com//news/UDh1suit.html
 
Top