next bulletin guess a waste of time, Fight Retro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, FOIA with USCIS

nato

Registered Users (C)
Folks just sitting and making guess for the next bulletins is a waste of time as we have seen, suprisingly some forum memebrs have time for that but not for making an effort to get the truth out or take out time to put in efforts for some intiatives

Even our name checks will expire and will have to be done again if we decide to wait for this retrogression to take its path. Then the FP, the employment verification, the W2, the tax records, the new I-94 if you travel out etc. the whole thing needs to be repeated like a viscous never ending loop!!!


I am aware of one lawyer who strongly believes that Retrogression is fabricated by USCIS and has submitted an FOIA with USCIS asking the basis.

Can we check with our lawyers to do the same, just a thought to see if others agree. Or also asking the OMBUDSMAN, here again only 1 person participated.
 
agreed

Yes i agree. All this guesstimating is absolutely useless (Eb2 tracking and EB3 tracking etc). We need to keep contacting congressmen etc. ANY updates on the FINAL committee?

WHO is OMBUDSMAN????
 
correct

the USCIS is oblidged to respond to OMBUDSMAN, I will put another of my past thread here to which not many forum folks participated, it has all the details of OMBUDSMAN email etc, even 8-10 emails to him can force USCIS to answer for the fabricated retro, just by the very fact of explaining why it is there as it is meaningless to have dates of 99 here and that too not being approved. we are now better placed to ask the questions as for OCT/NOV there are hardly any approvals and even the CP statisitcs show only 5-6 interviews scheduled for Nov in EB category for all 4 Indian Embassy together which again is an indication of hadnful of folks with those older PD.

we should keep our efforts on in all directions as S.1932 increasingly seems may not be approved and we may not see anything happening if we heavily depend on that only.

needgchelp said:
how about us sending emails to Ombudsman asking to help if anyway he can to reduce/remove retrogression?
 
we should really ask in a different way that why the dates are 99 and how many in

year are there and why they are not approved...
needgchelp said:
how about us sending emails to Ombudsman asking to help if anyway he can to reduce/remove retrogression?
 
Include USDOS

Nato,

If you/your lawyer feel it is a set-up, then it may be collective fabarication by both USDOS and USCIS. May be USDOL too.

Even I doubt the cut-off dates, particularly EB1 & EB2 (India and China).
 
not my lawyer, but I will post the link from another lawyers site

who claims it is a fabricated one and I think we all also believe that too, but our Indian lawyers are not doing much about fact finding here, so if some of us have good terms with our lawyer or have supportive lawyers they can file FOIA too
can_card said:
Nato,

If you/your lawyer feel it is a set-up, then it may be collective fabarication by both USDOS and USCIS. May be USDOL too.

Even I doubt the cut-off dates, particularly EB1 & EB2 (India and China).
 
Here is the note from a lawyer

The retrogression in EB cutoff dates is just flat out weird. It's no so much that it isn't possible as much as it is so improbable. To use that many visa numbers, CIS would have had to have reduced it's AOS backlog by about two thirds. I don't see any tangible evidence that has happened.

CIS recently stopped providing information about their AOS backlog. I have made a FOIA request for that information and I will post the results when I get them.

http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9&highlight=FOIA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is the OMBUDSMAN link

Please update the thread once you have emailed the OMBUDSMAN.

He has reacted positively to some of the email campaigns in past..and also may be responsible for some forward movement of cutoff dates in Nov.

Again we should make every effort on all fronts we never know which one pays off finally, but no effort surely will not pay off or just making guesses on the next month bulletin is not going to move the cutoff dates either

http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=193985&highlight=OMBUDSMAN
 
no takers here too busy or waiting for things to happen on their own, gave up already
 
Here is one of the format, may be Nozdam can paste what he sent out too

customize it to look different add / modify a few lines here and there

Have sent the following email to Immigration Ombudsman; Let us see what happens:
Dear Mr Khatri
The legal immigrant cummunity which consists of highly skilled professionals, engineers, doctors is in a state of shock with some contemplating to move back to India or other countries, as the priority date for EB3/EB2 is set back by 5-7 years. For India it moved back to January 1998 in October 2005 when the new year visa numbers are supposed to be available. We are even more shocked that it remained in January 1998 for the month of November 2005. Though the Dec 05 bulletin has seen some movements with your possible intervention could USCIS be more transparent on the number of cases in the system for each year at least upto 2002 as based on the data we have from our immigration forums the cases before 2000 are even less than 100 to count and the number of conuslar post EB interviews in India being less than 10 in Nov would also vouch for that.
Assuming that there was one EB3 India applicant with PD of 1st Jan 1998 who could not have been accommodated in October and the PD moved back to 1st Jan 1998, still this case was not approved to let the PD move forward siginificantly.
We request your kind intervention in this matter to help us find out how many EB3 India cases are pending with dates before 2000 and were approved in the month of October 2005 / November 2005 and whether there is any real justification for the PD dates to move all of a sudden from June 2002 to all the way back to January 1998. Everyone including the President Bush yesterday in Arizona seems to be giving GC for illegal immigrants but the plight of legal immigrants are no where in sight
Regards: Name
A#
SRC#
rayyan said:
Could you please post the letter format here?

Thx
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is the auto response i received from Cisombudsman@dhs.gov

Dear Mr. xxx,
Thank you for your inquiry and for bringing this issue to our
attention.
Please be aware that the Citizenship and Immigration Service Ombudsman
office (CISO) is dedicated to identifying systematic problems in the
immigration benefits process, and recommending solutions to the US
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The concerns you raised
in
your email will be considered as CISO develops recommendations to
improve the USCIS processes system. Again, thank you for contacting
Ombudsman office.


This is the letter i wrote:

Dear Sir,

I write to you, as one of the many skilled professional workers in the US. Our concerns regarding employment-based immigration have multiplied overnight due to the heavy and the highly unpredicted retrogression mentioned in the October 2005 Visa Bulletin published by DOS for all employment-based immigration categories (EB1, EB2) for India and China and EB3 worldwide.

According to this Visa Bulletin, the Visa Cutoff Dates are such that we would have to wait for another 6 to 8 years after having waited patiently for 1-2 years just for our labor certifications. The validity of our H1B visas is 6 years and beyond that we have to depend on yearly visa extensions, besides having severe restrictions, such as, we can't change jobs, can't visit our home country and so on. Our plight in this condition is beyond imagination!

I have been working here in the US for the last 4 years with a Software company and have been paying my taxes regularly. My employer has a permanent employment opportunity in the United States for which they have sponsored me for permanent residency to fill this position and it has been established that I am the most suitable candidate based on relevant professional experiences & skills and educational background. I have completed stages 1 and 2 of the Green card application i.e. The Labor Certification and the I-140. Unfortunately due to annual numerical limits on the employment based immigrant visa, and due to the heavy retrogression my permanent residency petition will be kept pending for need of visa numbers for an almost indefinite period of time, to the extent that I would be forced to return to my home country. In fact a many of us have already started planning on those lines! This would be very heart breaking for me as well as for my employer. Some are planning to move to more immigration friendly countries, for highly educated skill professions like Canada, UK, Australia, etc.

The other problem that we seem to face is, that our spouses, who are from our home countries, and are Highly educated and professionally qualified, cannot work here without a work permit. It feels extremely mentally degrading and depressing to them, to have to sit at home, inspite of having such wonderful qualifications in today's global economy. Until we can apply for our I-485's (The Third and final stage of the Permanent Residency / Green Card application) we cannot apply for work permits for them and hence they cannot work in the US.

The situation does not seem to have any end in sight if there are no immigration policy changes. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has done and is doing some commendable work in backlog reduction and PERM processing to expedite labor certifications, but this is meaningless if there are no employment based visa numbers available to successfully complete the immigration process.

There are many possible solutions to the problems we face today, such as,
1) Recapturing all the unused Visas for the past 10 years.
2) Increasing yearly quota of employment based immigrant visas
3) Removing the per-country visa limit or modifying it to suit the population ratio of each country.
4) Allowing I-485 and EAD filings even if visas are not available, and then processing I-485s per priority dates.
5) Counting Immigrant visa per primary applicant only, rather than counting for everyone in family
6) Making the immigration process independent of employer. Some of these measures are already mentioned in pending "Immigration Reform Bill".

As recently as last month, Mr. Bill Gates and Mr. Craig Barrett, some of the country's foremost industry leaders, spoke on the matter of legal immigration and pointed out that America's immigration system needs fixing. These visionaries have recognized that the economic progress and standard of living can only be achieved and maintained through qualified and skilled immigrant labor. Mr. Greenspan also indicated in his last month speech that US needs skilled immigrants for proper economic growth.

The USA is called the "land of opportunity". On behalf of all the legal and skilled professionals from around the world, I request that we be given the well-deserved opportunity to file our immigration status in a timely manner by resolving employment based visa retrogression. I request you to please do whatever is there in your powers to ease out our immigration problems which have caused a great deal of pain and depression to our whole community.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
 
rayyan said:
thanks guys,

I have sent out 3 emails onbehalf of my wife and me. Lets see waht happens..



I got the Std response

Thank you for your inquiry and for bringing this issue to our
attention.
Please be aware that the Citizenship and Immigration Service Ombudsman
office (CISO) is dedicated to identifying systematic problems in the
immigration benefits process, and recommending solutions to the US
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The concerns you raised
in
your email will be considered as CISO develops recommendations to
improve the USCIS processes system. Again, thank you for contacting
Ombudsman office.

Do they ever check their emails? :confused: :confused: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Top