Don't want to rain on your parade, but most people contributing in this forum are already employment based permanent residents. Why would we need a separate thread for this?
Hi Kali_Gc,
You mean only one day is enough to work for the GC sponsoring employer after getting the GC ?
Thanks
Strictly speaking that is true. But it is not entirely irrelevant, because the passing of AC21 into law shows that Congress did not intend for people to be locked into a single employer for great lengths of time and they explicitly established that it is OK to change one's intent after 180 days. If naturalization is denied for leaving quickly after the GC is obtained, even though you stayed with the sponsor for a long time after filing the I-485, the lawyer appealing the case will almost certainly point AC21 and mention that you stayed over 180 days with the sponsor. Of course, we don't know how the courts will see it, but I don't think AC21 is entirely irrelevant.lvr123,
AC-21 only applies before you get the GC.
After u get the GC, forget abt AC-21 applicability. It does not apply.
Strictly speaking that is true. But it is not entirely irrelevant, because the passing of AC21 into law shows that Congress did not intend for people to be locked into a single employer for great lengths of time and they explicitly established that it is OK to change one's intent after 180 days. If naturalization is denied for leaving quickly after the GC is obtained, even though you stayed with the sponsor for a long time after filing the I-485, the lawyer appealing the case will almost certainly point AC21 and mention that you stayed over 180 days with the sponsor. Of course, we don't know how the courts will see it, but I don't think AC21 is entirely irrelevant.
5 months while the I-485 was pending, plus 4 months after it was approved? Seems OK, but not as solid as somebody who spent (for example) 1 year while pending plus 6 months after approval. Unfortunately, we don't know what some anal IO having a bad day will decide, or what the judge will do if it is appealed, until there is an actual precedent in the courts.How about if one has approval less than 5 month and worked for 4 month after approval? Is that will be OK?