DISCLAIMER #1) This is a general trend of what I've observed in these forums and there obviously will be exceptions to these trends.
DISCLAIMER #2) Don't ask me for proof of these trends. I can't be bothered too. Take it with a grain, pinch or bag of salt if you wish to.
1) First, foremost and most obvious one: More cases filed originally at TSC are getting processed and processed earlier than transferred ones.
2) If TSC IO (POJ method) says NC not cleared and Infopass agent says cleared, its probably cleared.
3) They are processing cases based on a combination of PD and RD and not solely on one of these dates.
4) This may sound the opposite of point 3 but they are putting slightly more weight on PD than RD when prioritizing a case.
5) People who observe quietly and can't be bothered to actively participate in these forums and don't worry over NC, etc. tend to get approved without any problems than people who analyze TSC and come with theories and run from pillar to post about the status of their Name Checks
Feel free to add point 6 and onwards....
DISCLAIMER #2) Don't ask me for proof of these trends. I can't be bothered too. Take it with a grain, pinch or bag of salt if you wish to.
1) First, foremost and most obvious one: More cases filed originally at TSC are getting processed and processed earlier than transferred ones.
2) If TSC IO (POJ method) says NC not cleared and Infopass agent says cleared, its probably cleared.
3) They are processing cases based on a combination of PD and RD and not solely on one of these dates.
4) This may sound the opposite of point 3 but they are putting slightly more weight on PD than RD when prioritizing a case.
5) People who observe quietly and can't be bothered to actively participate in these forums and don't worry over NC, etc. tend to get approved without any problems than people who analyze TSC and come with theories and run from pillar to post about the status of their Name Checks
Feel free to add point 6 and onwards....