moving from one service center to another while a N400 is pending.

VivaLasVegas

Volunteer Moderator
I was doing some research on this subject as i wasn't able to find much information here and this is what I found out.

http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=1016|8767|6722|15979|5533

N-400 Issues

1. When an individual has filed an N-400 application in another jurisdiction, e.g. a resident of Dallas filing at the Texas Service Center who then moves to VSC jurisdiction and properly notifies the Center to transfer the file to VSC, what happens to that application? Does it go to the back of the line? Does it get any priority? How is it handled?


When an N400 applicant moves to a new jurisdiction, the address is updated in CLAIMS 4 (C4) to reflect this change. The C4 database is designed to acknowledge changes in jurisdiction as a result of address changes. Therefore, once the case is update electronically with a change of jurisdiction, it will be active under the new jurisdiction and not the old. Additionally, if a fingerprint appointment or interview needs to be rescheduled as a result of this address change, then CLAIMS 4 should ensure the required activities are rescheduled. If there is some problem, we will ensure the case is rescheduled for a fingerprint appt or interview.


Although the case may change jurisdiction to a new Service Center (local office under a new Center), the file does not physically move. Because C4 is electronically updated to reflect the new jurisdiction, the files are not relocated to the new Center. Rather, the files will remain at the Service Center were the application was originally filed. The case will be accessible for electronic interview scheduling under the appropriate local office based on the new address entered into CLAIMS 4. At that time that office schedules for interview, the file will be sent directly to the interviewing office instead of going from one Center to another and then to the local office.


AILA Committee Comment: VSC advises that when the case is transferred, it is placed “electronically” in line for scheduling in the new District based upon its original filing date. Accordingly, it does not lose its place in line but would be subject to whatever is the normal backlog for the new jurisdiction. e.g. A case is filed on January 2, 1999 in the Vermont Service Center based upon an address in New York City. The individual notifies the Service Center that he/she has moved to Miami. The case will be electronically transferred to the Texas Service Center as indicated above, while the file remains at the Vermont Service Center pending clearances and scheduling. The case will be scheduled in Miami when it is reached chronologically based upon the January 2, 1999 filing date.


is this still the case or has any one experienced any thing different than what is stated here? Feel free to discuss :)
 
That may well be what is supposed to happen, but sadly there are far too many reports of long delays incurred due to moving to believe everything is as simple as written. Maybe the problem lies in the execution?

Numerous first-hand reports suggest you should expect a 4+ month delay if you move district, and thats assuming your A file manages to find you again.
 
I looked up the link you have given. It's from 2000 and as we all know things have changed dramatically since Sept 2001. Honestly, I don't know how many of these pre-9/11 regs are valid anymore.
I, too, am looking for information about moving after filing N-400.
 
my experience

My application was in San Jose area around Feb 15 2007
I moved from San Jose to Los Angeles
Los Angeles is typically known for 4-6 months waiting period
I moved in August 2007 and got an interview on Jan 03 2008
naturally I received a Interview letter approx 40 days earlier.
 
My application was in San Jose area around Feb 15 2007
I moved from San Jose to Los Angeles
Los Angeles is typically known for 4-6 months waiting period
I moved in August 2007 and got an interview on Jan 03 2008
naturally I received a Interview letter approx 40 days earlier.

Sounds like you didn't do too bad. August+90 would put you in the November timeframe at the earliest, so only incurring an extra 2 months hit seems reasonable.
 
My interview was scheduled based on my old address (Fairfax, VA) rather than in MD where I'd moved. The interviewer did admit he could have forwarded my file to the appropriate office (Baltimore) but decided to go ahead and interview me (I guess so as not to delay my case any further). The timeline was pretty much in line with the other Washington DC timelines.

His decision to interview me ended up hurting me somewhat because I had to fly in for my interview from out of the country and then was told I would have to wait to hear from Baltimore to get sworn in (can't be sworn-in in a state other than where you reside). Anyway it's been two months since my interview and so far I've gotten a request for my marriage certificate and just received another letter asking me to come in for another set of fingerprints :(
 
Top