Maryland SESA Tracker

Status
Not open for further replies.
smallriver said:
Rahul,

Congratulations to you, but just give you a message that may not make you happy (It is a true fact, so you will not be mad of me).

The Phil office is also get blocked. I have been waiting there for a long time. I do not know when it will begin to move. please be patient.

Anyway, step by step. It is something good to pass this 3-year MD stupid lazy people.

dont worry I wont be mad on you ;) I am following philly ever since I am in MD and I know its screwed up badly, do you guyz remember those days when harrisburg and WV were current and philly used to work on applicatin within 3 month, well thats how it got screwed, people pile up applications from all those faster states and federal is playing bad cop now by going after all those forum-shopping companies, now who royally screwed up in this mess, people from MD, VA, who already waited months to get into philly

:mad:
 
Here is my case detail.

RIR - EB3
MD SESA 02/12/2001
NOF response 08/12/2004

Current Status: MD SESA is still processing my case

I just checked with my lawyer about my status. He said my case is still being processed at MD SESA. I don't know how long will it take to approve my case and move to Philly DOL.

I have a question to anyone whose case has been approved recently.

Normally how many months MD SESA will take to approve the case once they receive response for NOF? Any idea?
 
What kind of NOF was it?

Hey WhattheHeck,
What kind of NOF was raised in your case. Usually, its a prevailing wages query which does not take much time at MD Sesa once the employer agrees to pay the prevailing wage.
 
yours_sincerely said:
Hey WhattheHeck,
What kind of NOF was raised in your case. Usually, its a prevailing wages query which does not take much time at MD Sesa once the employer agrees to pay the prevailing wage.

yours_sincerely,
It was about prevailing wages and new ad postings.

Sincerly
Whatheheck
 
Re: Prevailing wages query

I talked to someone who owns a company, through an acquaintance, and he told me that usually such queries get cleared at local centres in a few months. His cases are from Harrisburg. Your case seems to be too prolonged (I had a similar query but its too early to say anything about it as the NOF was answered only recently by my lawyer).
 
Whattheheck,

Is your case received at MD SESA in Feb 2001 or Feb 2002?

It usually takes around 4 to 6 weeks to process at MD SESA after they receive a response to NOF.

So if the response was submitted on Aug 12th, my guess is that you will hear them before the end of September.

Can you share with us what was the exact query? Like did they ask the employer to increase the salary? and did they ask to run advertisements again?

yours_sincerely, please write more details about your query and the response you submitted? Also what was the LC submission date and when did u get the NOF?

Thank You.
 
Continuum of DOL L/C - USCIS 140/485 - Visa Number (Priority Dates) and Need for Agen

In the immigration proceedings, three agencies (Department of Labor, USCIS, and State Department) are closely interrelated and the workloads of each agency are affected by the policies and practices of the other related sister/brother agencies. It is like a stream of water flowing down in the valley. As more labor certification applications are approved in a shorter period of time, the increased volumes of I-140 petitions and I-485 applications will be dumped to the USCIS. Additionally, depending on the processing speed of I-140 petition or I-485 applications by the USCIS, it will add the workloads to the visa posts for immigrant visa applications, and eventually add pressures on the available immigrant visa numbers due to the current immigrant quota system. It thus appears that it is critically important that these three agencies work closely together and coordinate their policies and practice such that one agency would not create a mess with the related agency down the stream. For instance, both the DOL and USCIS initiated the reengineering of their systems and adjudication processes: DOL devised the backlog reduction plan and PERM program and the USCIS initiated electronic processing system and other changes including concurrent filing and concurrent adjudications as being tested in the form of so-called PILOT Programs.

Imagine the opening of flood gate if the DOL launched backlog reduction (300,000 cases) and PERM Program (21-day adjudication of labor certification applications) as scheduled under the DOL's 5-Year Strategic Plan of 1998. Had there not been 9/11 and its aftermath, the immigration agency probably could have met the challenge coming from this sister/brother agency's strategic plan for backlog reduction, even though we do not have any solid evidence that there was such coordination of policies between the Legacy INS and the U.S. Department of Labor. The 9/11 event changed everything. Unlike the labor certification proceedings, the USCIS' immigration proceedings are constrained by the priority task and mission of homeland security and the adjudication of I-485 applications can not be accomplished in such a rapid pace because of the political pressure for immigration "enforcement" and "security" assurance. The 9/11 has already created mountains of backlogs for the USCIS and things have been moving in a snail pace because of the political environment. Is the USCIS ready to deal with the flood of water flowing down from the U.S. Department of Labor, when it could not even handle its own existing backlog problems? Consumers may want to know what kind of efforts these two agencies are undertaking to coordinate their policies and practices.

President promised 5-year reduction program within five years. It is an open question how this could be achieved when the homeland security work within the Administration is probably completed less than a half to meet the mandate under the Homeland Security Act. Immigration proceedings are perceived by the population and the politics in this country as the focal point for protection of homeland security, and the speed of adjudications as affected by the security protection needs is expected to remain with the immigration system for a while. Granted, however, that the five-year plan is achievable and indeed achieve in 2006. It will indeed dry up the immigrant visa numbers accross the board including family-based as well as employment-based categories. The quota system is going to be so clogged that this country's immigration system may collapse. On top of this, the government has been talking about so-called Temporary Guest Worker Program.
Probably this country needs an entity at the higher level to review and coordinate the immigration policies and issues. The entity can be a part of the White House or legislative branch. This country lacks clearly vision and direction when it comes to the immigration. Everybody is kicking around "immigration" soccer ball sporatically towards all directions without a long-term national plan. Maybe, the year 2005 should be set aside and marked as a year for national forum for discussion and concensus for this country's direction for immigration without being tainted by election politics and party politics and agenda.
 
My query details

Mdgc,
My NOF said that the prevailing wage for this position is "Software Engineeer" is 82,750 something and my employer had to respond by either contesting it or by agreeing to pay the prevailing wage. Also, in case he agreed, he was supposed to put up a notice to this effect in our office premises for some 15-20 days. This NOF was received in the middle of Aug,2004. My lawyer told me about it around 25th of August. My employer agreed to pay the prevailing wage and I submitted the NOF document to my lawyer with my employer's initials on Aug 29,2004. I'm assuming he would have sent it by now.
 
yours_sincerely said:
Mdgc,
My NOF said that the prevailing wage for this position is "Software Engineeer" is 82,750 something and my employer had to respond by either contesting it or by agreeing to pay the prevailing wage. Also, in case he agreed, he was supposed to put up a notice to this effect in our office premises for some 15-20 days. This NOF was received in the middle of Aug,2004. My lawyer told me about it around 25th of August. My employer agreed to pay the prevailing wage and I submitted the NOF document to my lawyer with my employer's initials on Aug 29,2004. I'm assuming he would have sent it by now.


Yours_sincerely,
This is what happend in my case. A notice was put up in our office for 15 days and NOF was responded on Aug'12. When i checked recently it seems my case is still being processed at MD SESA.
 
mdgc2001 said:
Whattheheck,

Is your case received at MD SESA in Feb 2001 or Feb 2002?

It usually takes around 4 to 6 weeks to process at MD SESA after they receive a response to NOF.

So if the response was submitted on Aug 12th, my guess is that you will hear them before the end of September.

Can you share with us what was the exact query? Like did they ask the employer to increase the salary? and did they ask to run advertisements again?

yours_sincerely, please write more details about your query and the response you submitted? Also what was the LC submission date and when did u get the NOF?

Thank You.

mdgc2001,
Sorry it was a mistake. My MD SESA RD is Feb 12' 2002?.
Recieved NOF sometime during July'04 and responded the NOF on Aug 12'04.

Status: MD SESA still processing my case.
 
I guess the salary issue was raised by MD SESA coz they classified your position as Level II, instead of Level I. Can you please let us know if your position is a senior level position, or you have an advance degree, or you have several years of experience.... any idea why they classified your position asa level II. Thank you.


whatheheck said:
mdgc2001,
Sorry it was a mistake. My MD SESA RD is Feb 12' 2002?.
Recieved NOF sometime during July'04 and responded the NOF on Aug 12'04.

Status: MD SESA still processing my case.
 
My occupation is also "software engineer" and my salary is 78,000, about 5% lower than the prevailing wage 82,000. Is 5% difference allowed? Will my employer be required to raise my wage to the exactly the same number?
 
Salary requirement

Forever,
A 5% difference does not matter. You are just fine. When I got a query, my lawyer told me that even if my employer increases my salary to around 5% of the prevailing wage I would be ok.
 
Whattheheck,

Read the NOF details you posted. Yours was a simple query. As you submitted the response on Aug 12th, you will hear from them within next 2 or 3 weeks. Yours is a very routine NOF. Don't worry!

Update us when you hear from them.

Good Luck
mdgc2001
 
RIR Now processing 04/29/2002

We are

m o v i n g


Slow


RIR : Now processing 04/29/2002

NON RIR : Now processing 04/2001


Cheers,
Venu2000
 
Venu,

Thanks for the update. My application was received by the SESA on 4/25/02.
If my lawyer receives any update I will inform you all.

mdgc2001
 
Same here

my receipt date from MD labor is 4/24/02. I will post as soon as I get an update. Keeping my fingers crossed. I heard that it's a long long wait in Phily right now.
 
Yes Beam

UNFORTUNATLY... There is 14 months backlog there too... Hope the Backlog Reduction Center brings us some HOPE :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
DOL Dallas and Philadelphia Backlog Reduction Centers Update

This reported earlier that a contractor was selected in May 2004 by the DOL for the Dallas and Philadelphia Backlog Reduction Centers. The Contractor was actively recruiting analysts and other staff members to work at each Center. For each Center, the Contractor was recruiding over 80 workers including 60+ analysts. It appears that all these positions have been filled and the Contractor is no longer recruiting people for these positions in Dallas and Philadelphia Centers. This coincides with the AILA report that the two Centers started sending out letters to those alien labor certification application employers in Philadelphia and Dallas advising them that their cases have been transferred to the Centers and requesting update information. In a way, it is a good news.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top