Letter format idea to send to senators/congresspeople, next week

I could not post it in the I like Surya’s idea thread because it was closed. Next week along with calling NCSC phone number please write to your reps as well so that some action is taken at TSC.

Here is the link to find your congressperson
http://www.house.gov/writerep/

Here is the link to find your senator
http://www.senate.gov

I have sent this to John Cornyn and Lamar Smith (Texas) so if you are sending it to these folks then please modify this letter.

Honorable Mr. XXX,
Congressman XXXX

Sub: Started Green card process in 1998/1999 time frame, still waiting for approval. Delays in I-485 processing (Green card approvals) at BCIS (INS) Texas Service Center (TSC). 800 + signatures attached. Several hundreds from XXX state. Please help us.

Dear Sir:

In this letter I would like to highlight a serious problem at BCIS Texas Service Center that an immigration committee member like you can help.

It has been more than three months since BCIS has formed and we are still seeing that I-485’s are approved in the Vermont and the Nebraska Service Centers but not in Texas Service Center (TSC). Seems like a penalty for living in your state. The date for 485 approvals has not moved from Nov 1, 2000 for the past seven months. In addition to not approving 485’s TSC is also an year behind in processing I-485’s compared to the other service centers.
No one would argue, in light of the terrorist threats, the need to more fully verify potential immigrants into the United States. And if the additional checks required some additional time, so be it, the benefits far outweigh the small price in waiting.

However, when the average waiting time for a relatively simple approval process has gone from 6 months to approximately 33 months (stated by TSC as of now and could possibly extend to longer time periods), there is something sinisterly wrong with BCIS operating procedures. And for BCIS to cloak themselves under the guise of performing additional security checks is deliberately misleading.

In a post 9/11 environment, in spite of INS past embarrassments of approving terrorists posthumously, the President has given a mandate to the organization to ensure I485 approvals be completed within 6 months with all necessary security checks. Yet, in practice the complete opposite has happened, stretching approvals to an average of 30 + months as of now and possibly even further. In addition, BCIS specifically Texas Service Center has virtually stopped processing applications from Nov 1, 2002, first denying there was a freeze then later acknowledging there was a freeze when they upgraded their computer systems and then citing funding problems. In the face of a mountain of backlogged unapproved 485 applications no action has been done on the part of TSC to reduce the backlog whereas other service centers are processing some amount of applications.

Being forced to wait extraordinary lengths of time, the would be immigrant is forced every year to reapply to renew their EAD (Employment Authorization document) and Advance Parole (AP). With this huge problem, what does BCIS do? Do they focus their resources on approving the green cards? No, they put the resources on clearing the backlog of EAD's and AP’s, which are a temporary solution for the people waiting for the 485 (GC) approvals. If they would approve the 485, they would get rid of the backlog on EAD's and AP’s at the same time. But this logic escapes BCIS.

In addition, as part of the 485 process, each applicant submits to a fingerprint exercise, which gets sent to FBI to check their background. BCIS has a policy of expiring the fingerprints after 15 months. (which seems like a reasonable policy as the president himself has indicated that the process should take no longer than 6 months). Now because BCIS is now saying that it will take them 32-33 months to approve, they are reissuing fingerprint notices to applicants who must go through the process again. It begs the question, with their system of tracking dates, instead of focusing extra resources on clearing the EAD and AP backlog, why wouldn't BCIS focus their resources on approving cases that the fingerprints are due to expire?

The immigrant lives a precarious life waiting and hoping for his approval, and in these uncertain economic conditions, hopes he isn't laid off of his current employment. So it is a risk for someone who has lived in the US from anywhere between 5-15 years who has and continue to contribute to the economy and the general welfare of this country that they can be laid off from a company and they have to pack up and leave the country.

To voice the frustration and feeling of powerlessness with the lack of progress and responsiveness from the TSC (Texas Service Center) of the BCIS, the folks who are in this situation have organized a petition which you can here:
http://www.immigration.com/common/rsk/petition_texas_new.html

You can find the signatures of the petition here: More than 800 have signed (just by word of mouth) it as of early May.
http://www1.immigration.com/ins-tracker/petition_texas_new
What is a worthwhile read is the comments box in the petition, where you can get a very real sense of how this drawn out process is affecting the lives of these would be immigrants.

Since you are in the immigration committee we are hoping that you can somehow help us all by bring some pressure to bear on TSC and get them to actively commit to addressing the problem and resolving it quickly.
As an initiative to help TSC several of us folks are prepared to provide extra fees to the TSC or to the party you represent if funds seems to be the gating factor. So please let us know if providing the extra money either to your party or to TSC through your party will help. We are completely ignorant on this type of funding.
Thanks for any help you can provide. We are relying on your help and support.
Respectfully,


XXXX (On behalf of the folks who face these problems)

Attachment: Print out of list of 800+ signatures. Several hundred are from XXX State.
 
tru,
I called NCSC yesterday and the IIO there told me that they don't have access to our cases. I don't know whether they will have access next week also. Looks like we are all in for something. Atleast till now we were getting some response from TSC IIO but from next week even that will stop I guess :-(
I called TSC also after that, the IIO was very rude. She told me I have to wait and banged the phone down. It took me so much time to get the line and finally this is what happens.
I have also written to my senator, Mark Dayton, democrat,minnesota. I also told about the way IIO responds. I just have to wait and see now.
 
gcmspind

That is precisely the reason why when we call next week we have to tell the NCSC folks about TSC stoppage and ask them to inform their supervisor etc. and do something about it. Persistent nagging has to yield something.
Like you said when you call NCSC they won’t have the slightest clue about anything. But if 100’s call and ask them do something about TSC slow down instead of just asking for one’s case status word might get around.
Anyway we have live on hope and by doing stuff like these will pave the way for our GC’s.
 
Tru,

It is very well-written letter outlining the problems. However, you could have left the offer of funding out of it. Don't get me wrong. I am in the same boat as you (ND 09/01), my first LC was filed in Dec 1998, so I have been in this mess for a long time. I really commend your efforts in this board and outside in contacting Mr. Khanna, AILA, congressmen, senators, etc. To me that last paragraph is not very clear, particularly about paying fees to the representative's party. If funding is a problem I am willing to pay extra fund/fee to the TSC but I have no intention of paying fees to any political party. Thanks for the draft of the letter anyway. I am from Texas too, so I will send it to other members in the immigration committee from Texas after some modifications.

sg_rg2
 
sgrg2

The idea of funding the political party was thrown around a few days ago by a few people in-order to get things moving at TSC. And a few folks agreed to contact politicians to find out if this is possible. My way was to add the words in this letter to see what we get out of it, if any.
 
applaud tru

But the last para about help in funding is cheap and cheesy- not going to achieve anything from congressperson/senator except an invitation to the next fund raiser (personal experience)...

anyway kudos...
 
On 05/31 I sent an email to my Congress person requesting resolution to the stoppage of I-485 processing at TSC and asking for BCIS to establish regulations for AC21.
 
Top