GreatPortland
Registered Users (C)
Iguess means yours is still not processed.
I am on the same boat.
I am on the same boat.
LC in Oreagon
- Thread starter GreatPortland
- Start date
Checking some of the cases
I went back and checked some of other cases. I am surprised to find some of them got through:
Case No Date Received DOT CODE Status
095xxx40 7/26/02 999.373-012 Received
095xxx41 7/26/02 999.491-011 Certified 09/13/2002
095xxx42 7/24/02 999.352-014 Certified 09/12/2002
095xxx43 7/26/02 999.352-014 Certified /12/2002 095xxx44 7/26/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx45 7/15/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx46 7/15/02 313.361-030 Certified09 /12/2002
095xxx47 7/15/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx48 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx49 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx50 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx52 7/26/02 003.061.034 Certified on Oct 2nd 2002
What I can not understand is some of the cases after my case are getting approved. Please let me know the logic behind this
Thanks
SP
I went back and checked some of other cases. I am surprised to find some of them got through:
Case No Date Received DOT CODE Status
095xxx40 7/26/02 999.373-012 Received
095xxx41 7/26/02 999.491-011 Certified 09/13/2002
095xxx42 7/24/02 999.352-014 Certified 09/12/2002
095xxx43 7/26/02 999.352-014 Certified /12/2002 095xxx44 7/26/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx45 7/15/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx46 7/15/02 313.361-030 Certified09 /12/2002
095xxx47 7/15/02 030.062-010 Received
095xxx48 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx49 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx50 7/15/02 189.167-010 Received
095xxx52 7/26/02 003.061.034 Certified on Oct 2nd 2002
What I can not understand is some of the cases after my case are getting approved. Please let me know the logic behind this
Thanks
SP
gc_come_to_papa
Registered Users (C)
Certification
Guys,
I guess it has to do with job type, another friend of mine who works as RF engineer got certified from Salem, OR, his was EB2-RIR went to SFO on September 29th, 2002. I will find out what i can and get back to the group.
Let's keep our fingers crossed.
Guys,
I guess it has to do with job type, another friend of mine who works as RF engineer got certified from Salem, OR, his was EB2-RIR went to SFO on September 29th, 2002. I will find out what i can and get back to the group.
Let's keep our fingers crossed.
gc_come_to_papa
Registered Users (C)
clarification
From SESA in salem , OR it went TO SFO on Sep 29th and got certified yesterday.
GC
From SESA in salem , OR it went TO SFO on Sep 29th and got certified yesterday.
GC
GreatPortland
Registered Users (C)
any new infomation
for Oreagon LC?
for Oreagon LC?
gc_come_to_papa
Registered Users (C)
call at this number
SP, Call at this number to see what it is..
(503) 947-1678. this ALC number in salem, guy is very helpful
hope it helps, gC
SP, Call at this number to see what it is..
(503) 947-1678. this ALC number in salem, guy is very helpful
hope it helps, gC
Re: email address
I tried to check my status. I live in Portland, Oregon.
I tried both lcstatus10@doleta.gov and lcstatus09@doleta.gov. With "Case XXXXXXXX" in the message body (No subject), I did not get any response. I do not know why. How long should I wait till the response gets back? Any information will be very appreciated. Thanks.
I tried to check my status. I live in Portland, Oregon.
I tried both lcstatus10@doleta.gov and lcstatus09@doleta.gov. With "Case XXXXXXXX" in the message body (No subject), I did not get any response. I do not know why. How long should I wait till the response gets back? Any information will be very appreciated. Thanks.
What RD from OR is SFO processing
Does any one know what the approval rate for IT in OR is like?
CA seems to be remanding all It related cases to State.
Also, Does "Electronics Engineer" come under IT ?
Read this posting .. it's scary!!
For over a month, the Region VI Department of Labor has been remanding "high tech" reduction in recruitment labor certification applications to the State Workforce Agencies for regular processing without first giving employers the opporutnity to retest the labor market. This process has been dubbed the "auto-remand." The Certifying Officer for Region VI, Martin Rios, told AILA Liaison in a recent teleconference that virtually all high tech RIR cases filed during the period of August/September of 2001 through calendar year 2002 will be remanded. (The official minutes for that meeting will be distributed as soon as they are approved by DOL.) In June, 1,400 such cases were remanded to the Employment Development Department. As many as
10,000 additional cases are likely to be remanded over the coming months if the current policy persists. It will take approximately 4.5 to 5.5 years for the remanded cases to be processed by EDD under normal processing.
Mr. Rios attended a national conference of Certifying Officers in late May at which the COs were told that they had the discretion to deny the RIR aspect of a labor certification if they believed that U.S. workers were
available at the time of the initial filing of the labor certification. The "auto-remand" policy is based Mr. Rios' belief that in late 2001 and throughout 2002 technology-based companies in the region were downsizing.
Mr. Rios has agreed to discuss the auto-remand policy in a future teleconference with AILA DOL Liaison and a representative from the National DOL office.
In the upcoming teleconference with Mr. Rios and the National DOL representative, AILA DOL Liaison will contest the auto-remand policy on the grounds that the process eliminates individualized review of RIR labor
certifications. Since each case varies greatly from one to another, denying all cases for the same reason without some individualized review of the facts is patently arbitrary. This is an important issue for our
members' business immigration clients. Therefore, we are seeking the assistance of the membership in lobbying the National DOL to soften the auto-remand policy.
Does any one know what the approval rate for IT in OR is like?
CA seems to be remanding all It related cases to State.
Also, Does "Electronics Engineer" come under IT ?
Read this posting .. it's scary!!
For over a month, the Region VI Department of Labor has been remanding "high tech" reduction in recruitment labor certification applications to the State Workforce Agencies for regular processing without first giving employers the opporutnity to retest the labor market. This process has been dubbed the "auto-remand." The Certifying Officer for Region VI, Martin Rios, told AILA Liaison in a recent teleconference that virtually all high tech RIR cases filed during the period of August/September of 2001 through calendar year 2002 will be remanded. (The official minutes for that meeting will be distributed as soon as they are approved by DOL.) In June, 1,400 such cases were remanded to the Employment Development Department. As many as
10,000 additional cases are likely to be remanded over the coming months if the current policy persists. It will take approximately 4.5 to 5.5 years for the remanded cases to be processed by EDD under normal processing.
Mr. Rios attended a national conference of Certifying Officers in late May at which the COs were told that they had the discretion to deny the RIR aspect of a labor certification if they believed that U.S. workers were
available at the time of the initial filing of the labor certification. The "auto-remand" policy is based Mr. Rios' belief that in late 2001 and throughout 2002 technology-based companies in the region were downsizing.
Mr. Rios has agreed to discuss the auto-remand policy in a future teleconference with AILA DOL Liaison and a representative from the National DOL office.
In the upcoming teleconference with Mr. Rios and the National DOL representative, AILA DOL Liaison will contest the auto-remand policy on the grounds that the process eliminates individualized review of RIR labor
certifications. Since each case varies greatly from one to another, denying all cases for the same reason without some individualized review of the facts is patently arbitrary. This is an important issue for our
members' business immigration clients. Therefore, we are seeking the assistance of the membership in lobbying the National DOL to soften the auto-remand policy.