infostarved
Registered Users (C)
Your interpretation of sched A is wrong
Your conclusion on Sched A is wrong. Read my post on the "doing the math" thread.
Your conclusion on Sched A is wrong. Read my post on the "doing the math" thread.
ShibuGeorge said:Guys, When you consider the visa number usage,
Also keep in mind that Scedule A workers is current.
Although the Visa Bullettin Says "up to 50,000" visas,
I have heard that they use up the regular numbers first.
So what will end up happening is, even the existing
eb3 regular visas can be drained by Schedule A workers
even as other eb3 workers get 'NOTHING' because of
cut-off date being pegged at Jan 1998.
Now, correct me if I am wrong; 2006 eb3 numbers
will be used up by Schedule A and after those are over
they can eat into their own 50K visa allotment.
Initially I thought the schedule A is only till Sept 30
(end of FY 2005) Now it appears that DOS forgot about that part
of the law that created it!
I think Schedule A category and Labor substitutions is what will do havoc to
eb3 GC aspirants. It s not the existing pending cases.
And I beleive this is UNFAIR
true GC not a right
But Atleast why cant they have a temp visa program and subsequent
GC just like techies.
Bottom Line: Other EB3 categories, forget about GC approvals
for a couple of years and sit tight
What a miserable situation for guys here in the US for 8 to 10+
years and wasting their prime life anxious about the
"idiocracy" (I dont know if this word exists) of this system