Is it possible?

W

wantmygcnow

Volunteer Moderator
I am hearing more and more about RFE's that The USCIs is requesting. Is it possible that immigration is making things harder because of the additional 33,000 to be used due the lawsuit?

Can immigration prolong the RFE process and still claim "we are using our quota"..??? It seems to me there should be no need for RFE other than prove you been in country for one year and/or mistakes in the biographic form..
 
More Excuses

May be they are looking for more excuses for denying more and more AOS cases to make their backlog look less ugly :mad:
 
That is exactly what I thought and that why I posted a seperate thread for this issue. I think they are at some kind of revenge path for losing the case for 33,000 visas.
 
I wouldn't buy that hypothesis because according to the settlement agreement, INS is not only required to make 33,000 available but they must use all in 3 three years. I think "3 years" is the key point. Given this timeframe--I wouldn't see a ground/reason for INS to delay issuing GC. We heard people with RD of Feb 2000 have been contacted. That is good sign of progress, I believe. Having said that I don't believe that INS has enough resources to make the 18,000 visa available in the current fiscal year which ends September 2005 (this is part of the settlement agreement). We will find out soon.

this is just my thought...

go2bk
 
People don't be afraid of any RFE requests. Just send them what they want. It might not make sense for you but apparently it does for them. By the law Asylees are eligible for status adjustment to permanent resident and there is nothing nobody can do about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top