If the salary being paid currently by GC sponsor is lesser than LC proferred wages, is it necessay to invoke AC-21 ?
http://www.murthy.com/news/ukchange.html
"The economy is not a constant. We have seen in the last two years that the salaries for many high tech positions have been reduced. The dramatic changes generally have been from the time of filing the labor certification until the adjudication of the I-485 application. If the applicant is past the 180-day threshold and has been informed that the employer will not pay the salary listed on the labor certification once the green card is approved, the applicant should consider notifying INS that AC21 portability provisions apply in his/her case."
But once again, one hears about the 'risks' in using AC-21. I also think that AC-21 might delay processing time. So will a better alternative to AC-21 in this situation be an additional line in the EVL that says 'we still maintain intent to pay proferred wages of USD xxx,xxx once the GC approval has been obtained.' ?
http://www.murthy.com/news/ukchange.html
"The economy is not a constant. We have seen in the last two years that the salaries for many high tech positions have been reduced. The dramatic changes generally have been from the time of filing the labor certification until the adjudication of the I-485 application. If the applicant is past the 180-day threshold and has been informed that the employer will not pay the salary listed on the labor certification once the green card is approved, the applicant should consider notifying INS that AC21 portability provisions apply in his/her case."
But once again, one hears about the 'risks' in using AC-21. I also think that AC-21 might delay processing time. So will a better alternative to AC-21 in this situation be an additional line in the EVL that says 'we still maintain intent to pay proferred wages of USD xxx,xxx once the GC approval has been obtained.' ?