neversay_never
Registered Users (C)
Hi,
I have an interview scheduled this 12/11 in NE for my I-485.
I have a clause in the document sent by NE for my I-485 interview which states
"Beneficiary must bring two (2X2) photos. Petitioner must appear at interview with you. If petitioner fails to appear, your application may be denied."
Who is the petitioner here? Is it my company or my lawyer? I know I am the beneficiary because they asked for photos (whose else photos would they require).
Is my company the petitioner or the company's attorney the petitioner.
When I asked my lawyer she said that, this center usually does family based immigration and that the "petitioner" means a relative or somebody in a family.
Is she correct?
Also, for this interview should I take my attorney? According to my attorney, they feel that they are not needed. My company says that they are not going to reimburse the expenses (which could run into thousands of dollars for their air tickets, hotel accommodation, and time). They say it is strictly upto me (wrt expenses) if I want to take the attorney for interview.
Its just that clause "petitioner must be present" makes me scared, and I am thinking its my attorney. Am I right?
Has anyone had this happen to them before. Do you guys think I need to take the attorney with me?
All your inputs are much much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I have an interview scheduled this 12/11 in NE for my I-485.
I have a clause in the document sent by NE for my I-485 interview which states
"Beneficiary must bring two (2X2) photos. Petitioner must appear at interview with you. If petitioner fails to appear, your application may be denied."
Who is the petitioner here? Is it my company or my lawyer? I know I am the beneficiary because they asked for photos (whose else photos would they require).
Is my company the petitioner or the company's attorney the petitioner.
When I asked my lawyer she said that, this center usually does family based immigration and that the "petitioner" means a relative or somebody in a family.
Is she correct?
Also, for this interview should I take my attorney? According to my attorney, they feel that they are not needed. My company says that they are not going to reimburse the expenses (which could run into thousands of dollars for their air tickets, hotel accommodation, and time). They say it is strictly upto me (wrt expenses) if I want to take the attorney for interview.
Its just that clause "petitioner must be present" makes me scared, and I am thinking its my attorney. Am I right?
Has anyone had this happen to them before. Do you guys think I need to take the attorney with me?
All your inputs are much much appreciated. Thanks in advance.