INS is going to abolish??????
- Thread starter hyd66
- Start date
I think it is good!
http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/was...1.tlt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml
The above report by the Senator tells in detail about the current problems that concern us. "About 5 million pending cases", "cannot get any answers from service centers either through phone or website", "long processing times", "cannot enforce current rules", etc.
I for one support splitting INS into 2 functional units.
http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/was...1.tlt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml
The above report by the Senator tells in detail about the current problems that concern us. "About 5 million pending cases", "cannot get any answers from service centers either through phone or website", "long processing times", "cannot enforce current rules", etc.
I for one support splitting INS into 2 functional units.
padmamutta
Registered Users (C)
It is a very good news
I think it is a good news for future Green cards holders but not for current.
I think it is a good news for future Green cards holders but not for current.
Don\'t believe......
this thing either way. The world is not going to change overnight
and I am pretty sure that this "abolish the INS" is going to significantly slow down in the Senate. The way things typically work
in the U.S. Congress is the House passes a bunch of laws and then these laws get bottlenecked in the Senate (sort of like at INS TSC,
if you get my drift...
). So barring another attack and/or another
INS Snafu, this thing might be held up in the Senate for months. Then
they will have to go to conference to iron out the differences between
the House and Senate versions of the bill. Only then will the bill go
to the president to sign it. Already, Senator Kennedy has indicated he does not like the House bill, so it will significantly be slower in
the Senate.
this thing either way. The world is not going to change overnight
and I am pretty sure that this "abolish the INS" is going to significantly slow down in the Senate. The way things typically work
in the U.S. Congress is the House passes a bunch of laws and then these laws get bottlenecked in the Senate (sort of like at INS TSC,
if you get my drift...
). So barring another attack and/or anotherINS Snafu, this thing might be held up in the Senate for months. Then
they will have to go to conference to iron out the differences between
the House and Senate versions of the bill. Only then will the bill go
to the president to sign it. Already, Senator Kennedy has indicated he does not like the House bill, so it will significantly be slower in
the Senate.
Correct
The bill hasn\'t even cleared the senate yet. The bill just passed the House. It must pass the Senate and be signed by the president before it\'s even definite. Even once it is definite, there will likely be a significant delay before anything really changes. AC21 passed a year and a half ago and we still don\'t even have implementing regulations for it. All AC21 did is make some changes in immigration law and procedure, this thing would eliminate INS and break it in 2 parts. It certainly isn\'t going to happen tomorrow.
Jim
James D. Mills
Attorney at Law
http://www.geocities.com/jamesdmillsesq/
The bill hasn\'t even cleared the senate yet. The bill just passed the House. It must pass the Senate and be signed by the president before it\'s even definite. Even once it is definite, there will likely be a significant delay before anything really changes. AC21 passed a year and a half ago and we still don\'t even have implementing regulations for it. All AC21 did is make some changes in immigration law and procedure, this thing would eliminate INS and break it in 2 parts. It certainly isn\'t going to happen tomorrow.
Jim
James D. Mills
Attorney at Law
http://www.geocities.com/jamesdmillsesq/