I-485 case numbers for Project Kashmir and Anaconada

[kashmir]

Please read my message at Project Kashmir about the list of I-485 case numbers,
and vote your opinion.
-kashmir

 

[kashmir]

Please read jokerpoker_us's message for Project Anaconda.
I believe the Project Anaconda would do the better job than the Project Kashmir in near future
so that you don't worry about the Project Kashmir being cancelled.
Successful starting up of the Project Anaconda would really rely on transfer of I-485 case number list.
-kashmir

 

[jokerpoker_us]

Project Anaconda takes off where Project Kashmir left.
It would be best to have a organized way of walking
through BCIS database. One person can do it better.
Opening up the list to everyone means that we will
be competing for meagre resources. Already there are
very few free proxy servers. It is better to have a
single person do it.

Project Anaconda does it smart by cycling through
proxy servers and benchmarking proxy servers so
that faster proxies can be used. If you vote for the
list to be transferred to Project Anaconda then we
can hit the ground running.

So people please vote to transfer the list of valid
485 numbers to Project Anaconda. If you need to
know what is going on and what kind of progress
BCIS is making please do vote on this critical issue.

 

[mango_pickle]

Kashmir, I have already voted. But I'd say just transfer to Anaconda, instead of publishing it on forum.

 

[kashmir]

Originally posted by mango_pickle
Kashmir, if you already know the valid wac numbers, why do you need to publish in the forum. Can you not email to jokerpoker ?

Hi, mango_pickle,
It's a good question.
Actually, email to jokerpoker_us is OPTION #2 of vote.
The reason why I am asking you to vote is:
All case numbers had not been scanned initially by me (kashmir).
Actually, I had scanned more than 1 million cases,
but many volunteers in this forum sent me the partial list of I-485 case numbers.
So, I think the data is not only mine but should be shared in this forum.
This is OPTION #1 of vote.
I want some kind of consensus here.
-kashmir

 

[Atri123]

Kashmir,
You are doing a great job. Kudos to you.
I voted for #2.

I dont think its needed to post the list in the forum, even though many people volunteered to collect the list. If somebody else is going to work on any similar project, its good to share with them.

You guys are doing a great job and Thank you very much.

 

[140_takes_4ever]

Good idea to transfer data over to project Anaconda. Nothing to be gained by transfering the data to the open forum, because we will have duplication of efforts and hits on BCIS database which might be detrimental.

 

[give_GC_now]

I think its better to Xfer the list rather than posting on forum. Its better to work safely rather than unkowingly inviting troubles

 

[kashmir]

I'd appreciate your comments.
97.2% (35/36) agree on transfer of data to Project Anaconda so far.
I will e-mail it to jokerpoker_us this evening so that Project Anaconda can use it for this weekend
unless strong objection would be raised by 9pm today.
-kashmir

 

[kashmir]

May the Project Kashmir open the list of I-485 case numbers ?

11  22.45%  Yes, the Project Kashmir may post the list on the forum.
36  73.47%  The Project Kashmir may transfer the list to the [url=http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=101835]Project Anaconda[/url] only.
 2   4.08%  No, the Project Kashmir should not open the list.
 0   0%     Others - Please describe your opinion.

The data had been passed to jokerpoker_us for the Project Anaconda,
however, his project seems to have some trouble.

If you want to scan instead of Project Kashmir or Project Anaconda,
please send e-mail to kashmir@covad.net .
I will send you the data in response.
-kashmir