StatusFinder
Registered Users (C)
I-140 Approved [EB-2]
I got my 140 approved on 02/03/2005. Received automated mail from USCIS.
Case Details:
Got RFE for "ability to pay" and response was received on 01/28/05. LUD on 01/31/05 and 02/01/05.
Till yesterday, Telephonic enquiry says - sytem problem in getting the status of I-140. & online status shows that they received the RFE response on 01/28.
I had the same problem before 12/01/2004 with the automated telephonic status enquiry [ system problem ] and it was set right on 12/01/04 once they issued the RFE.
With the Approval, now I am sure that automated telephonic message system gives you more accurate status. If it says some problem in retrieving the information then it is an indication that someone may be working on your case ....may be RFE ....may be approval. It is purely my belief.
LC -sub in EB2, concurrently Filed
I-140/485 RD March 15th 2004
I-140 RFE on Dec 1st 2004 ,response received on 01/28/2005
I-140 LUD 12/01/2004,01/28/2005,01/31/2005,02/01/2005....APPROVED ON 02/03/2005
I got my 140 approved on 02/03/2005. Received automated mail from USCIS.
Case Details:
Got RFE for "ability to pay" and response was received on 01/28/05. LUD on 01/31/05 and 02/01/05.
Till yesterday, Telephonic enquiry says - sytem problem in getting the status of I-140. & online status shows that they received the RFE response on 01/28.
I had the same problem before 12/01/2004 with the automated telephonic status enquiry [ system problem ] and it was set right on 12/01/04 once they issued the RFE.
With the Approval, now I am sure that automated telephonic message system gives you more accurate status. If it says some problem in retrieving the information then it is an indication that someone may be working on your case ....may be RFE ....may be approval. It is purely my belief.
LC -sub in EB2, concurrently Filed
I-140/485 RD March 15th 2004
I-140 RFE on Dec 1st 2004 ,response received on 01/28/2005
I-140 LUD 12/01/2004,01/28/2005,01/31/2005,02/01/2005....APPROVED ON 02/03/2005
Last edited by a moderator: