This is just a random question about finger print expiration. Is there a scientific reason that after 2 years or whatever finger prints are no longer reliable?
What's the point of all the databases of fingerprints with criminals/terrorists if they're prints are going to change in 2 years? Do they track these criminals/terrorists down and re-fingerprint them every two years to keep information current?
Isn't someone's finger-print like DNA, a unique and unchangeable thing?
Maybe brand new criminals/terrorists would have entered the databases, so they need to re-check, but they can do that easily with the existing prints they have from 485 people. So that's not really a reason to re-fingerprint people.
I'm just curious why...
WAC-02-155-XXXXX
What's the point of all the databases of fingerprints with criminals/terrorists if they're prints are going to change in 2 years? Do they track these criminals/terrorists down and re-fingerprint them every two years to keep information current?
Isn't someone's finger-print like DNA, a unique and unchangeable thing?
Maybe brand new criminals/terrorists would have entered the databases, so they need to re-check, but they can do that easily with the existing prints they have from 485 people. So that's not really a reason to re-fingerprint people.
I'm just curious why...
WAC-02-155-XXXXX