help your self, ask your family/friends to vote for Kerry for his immigration policy:

Status
Not open for further replies.

asdffdsa

Registered Users (C)
Kerry's policy: expediting legal immigration process, and improving border control.
Bush's policy is to embrace illegal immigrants, which will further burden the system. And without sufficient funding, it will jeopadize the national security, besides slow down the legal immigrant process.

Plus Kerry can do better in economy, cut down the war cost, put more tax money into goverment agency(like DHS/USCIS).

With Kerry's immigration policy clarified, it is not likely he will waste much money and time on useless things like reforming a couple of agencies that Bush did. Keep Bush in office for another 4 years, only encourage him to keep doing what he has done.

Especially if you have family/friends in AZ, NV, CO, WA, you can make a difference!
 
I don't see how immigrants are going to get any additional benefits if Kerry wins. Whatever you hear from the candidates, it's all pre-election politics to get vote, nothing much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
why is Bush so wonderful?

Hey GeorgeF,
Why is Bush such a wonderful president? No one seems to ever answer this question.

-an independent
 
Kerry

I am not GeorgeF but ... he didn't say he would vote for Bush (who knows maybe he would I dont know).

BUT as I know there are other candidates as well, other than those 2 :eek: :rolleyes: !!!
 
Dear szilvia74 and foreigner123456,

asdffdsa is urging people to vote for Kerry because he/she thinks his policies are clarified etc. I counldn't disagree more.

If I were to base my vote for president solely for what he has done or "is planning to do" for immigrants, then here are some facts:

President Bush's five-year, $500 million initiative, begun in FY 2002, to attain a universal six-month processing time standard for all immigration benefit applications, and provide quality service to all legal immigrants, citizens, businesses and other CIS customers.
The CIS budget for FY 2004 includes $1.8 billion, a 9% increase ($143 million) over FY 2003 to support further improvements in application processing as well as the processing of projected volume. The $1.8 billion is comprised of $236 million in appropriated funding and approximately $1.6 billion in projected fee revenues.

Now this is a track record of the current president, not a pre-election rhetoric as mentioned by usnycus.

So please ask your friends/relatives not only to listen to what asdffdsa or GeorgeF have to say but rather to educate themsleves on candidates, their stand on issues and their past record and to vote accordingly.
 
Here is another track record for USCIS after Bush took over:

Immigration cases pending (in Sep 2000): 2,928,254
Immigration cases pending (in Sep 2001): 4,083,052
Immigration cases pending (in Sep 2002): 4,382,379
Immigration cases pending (in Sep 2003): 5,510,553 :mad:

Major volumes of pending cases at the end of fiscal year:

a) Year 2000
I-485 permanent resident adjustments - 1,001,479
I-130 relative petitions - 806,899
I-90 Green Card replacements - 237,573
I-765 employment authorizations - 256,451

b) Year 2001
I-485 permanent resident adjustments - 971,866
I-130 relative petitions - 1,594,048
I-90 Green Card replacements - 256,527
I-765 employment authorizations - 267,329

c) Year 2002
I-485 permanent resident adjustments - 966,472
I-130 relative petitions - 1,613,826
I-90 Green Card replacements - 499,725
I-765 employment authorizations - 392,907

d) Year 2003
I-485 permanent resident adjustments - 1,238,371
I-130 relative petitions - 1,889,779
I-90 Green Card renewals/replacements - 764,185
I-765 employment authorizations - 460,908

Looks like 500 million initiative is not working. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not exactly!

usnycus said:
Here is another track record for USCIS after Bush took over:

Looks like 500 million initiative is not working. :D

It's not another track record.. just the size of the back log. You can't judge the efficiency of operations by looking solely at the backlog, without looking at the overall volume increase. Then you have to take into consideration the rate at which the backlog grows (the momentum). If the rate of growth slows over the time it means that eventually the backlog will start shrinking, instead of growing.

I'm not happy with the speed at which the USCIS operates but I think they are at least trying and that the initiative comes all the way from the top.

Bush didn't take over USCIS. He is "just" a President. He can't go down there and run day to day operations. He can, however, start an initiative to increase the funding for CIS by a reasonable amount, which HE DID!

What exactly is it that Kerry would do more? And why do you think so? Because his campaign public relations issued a statement? Well, you better save that statement, because there might be something different coming out of his mouth tomorrow.
 
That's the whole point. He can't do anything; he & Kerry both can only make pre-election promises.

BTW, USCIS is created by Bush administration and still no one understands what they achieved or trying to achieve. :confused:

Let me guess – “to cover up 9-11 failure.” :D

GeorgeF said:
Not exactly!
.........
Bush didn't take over USCIS. He is "just" a President. He can't go down there and run day to day operations.

..............
 
usnycus said:
Let me guess – “to cover up 9-11 failure.” :D

No, not at all. There were calls from both parties to split INS into 2 (or more) bureaucracies well before 9/11.
 
A little perspective here please.

On April 30, 2001, 245i sunset creating a huge number of filings for green cards, many of them frivilous. On September 10, 2001, President Bush met with Mexican President Vincente Fox to discuss extending 245i. The next morning, on September 11, 2001 some people flew some big airplanes into some tall buildings (and the Pentagon) and immigration benefits were put on the back burner by the entire govenment. All the government was focussing on was enforcement. On March 11, 2002, INS sealed its own fate by granting visa extensions to two of the hijackers. INS has subsequently been torn apart into 3 separate agencies and is not even under the Department of Justice anymore.

Not to mention, concurrent filing of the I-140 and I-485 greatly increases the number of petitions pending at any given time. USCIS could drastically reduce the number of pending petitions by eliminating concurrent filing.

You guys like that idea?
 
Background:
The economic policies of the George W. Bush Jnr Administration are essentially those of the Neoconservative right as developed during the Reagan presidency.

Neoconservatives believe that the state cannot improve the lot of the disadvantaged poor by education and welfare programmes financed through taxation. The Neoconservative solution is massively to decrease the taxation and regulation of corporations and of the rich, replacing progressive taxation wherever possible with low flat rates. The role of the state in the provision of education and welfare is reduced and replaced as much as possible by private charity.

Unsurprisingly for a movement financed by corporate America, the George W Bush Neoconservatives start from the proposition that what is good for US business is good for America. In their view, environmental programmes increase business costs and therefore they should be abolished or rolled back. Hence the US stand on Kyoto. The US Steel industry needs help - hence it is subsidised in breach of WTO Rules. Agribusiness and US Farmers are an important constituency - hence the push on genetically modified foods and the farm subsidies legislation.

Above all, Neoconservatives believe in "supply side economics" - tax cuts for the very rich make for the mythical "trickle down" effect which stimulates the economy.

Bush's Mid-Term Economic Score Card
At the time of the mid-term elections in 2002, the AFL-CIO (the American Trade Union movement), published a report on the Bush Administration's economic performance. Among its highlights were these statements:-

a) The nation has lost 1.7 million jobs over the past two years after adding 5 million jobs in 1999 and 2000. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, there are 2.5 job seekers for every job opening.

b) Workers who still have health insurance are paying substantially more for it. Workers’ premium payments rose 27 percent for single coverage and 16 percent for family coverage in 2002. Most employers are passing along more costs to workers in 2003 and plan to do so next year.

c) More than 2 million unemployed workers have run out of their regular state-provided unemployment benefits and the emergency unemployment benefits they received under the temporary federal program. Many of these workers now have no jobs—and no means of support.

d) Bankruptcy filings continue at a recordsetting pace. Filings for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2002—more than 1.5 million cases—were almost 8 percent greater than the 2001 fiscal year. And the total number of cases filed in the three-month period ending last September set the national record for any three-month period in U.S. history.

e) Unemployment is at an eight-year high and expected to grow. Ten million unemployed workers want jobs but cannot find them. More than 4 million work only part time because they cannot get full-time positions.

f) Reversing real progress at the end of the 1990s, the ranks of the uninsured rose to more than 41 million in 2001. An estimated 300,000 individuals lost health coverage during the first six months of 2002. Most Americans without insurance—80 percent—are in working families.

g) For workers who have lost billions in retirement savings, the 2002 year-end investment reports brought more bad news: The stock market declined for the third consecutive year, marking the first three-year losing streak in 60 years. Losses in the major indices in 2002 were roughly double those of 2001, and the Dow’s losses almost tripled those of 2000.

h) States are experiencing their worst financial crisis since World War II, with cumulative three-year budget shortfalls that exceed $180 billion. States are laying off workers and making deep cuts in health care, education and public safety funding. For the first time in eight years, they are raising taxes—ironically, a step they are forced to take in part because of tax cuts and other cutbacks at the federal level.


Also, go through following link and make your own conclusion.

http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/bush-econ.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top