New to this forums. Best regards to all. I applied both EB-1 and NIW at the same time and got identical refs at the same time. I checked my Notice before showing "Section: Indiv w/Adv Deg or Exceptional Ability in the National Interest" and "Section: Alien of Extraordinary Ability, Sec.203 (b) (1) (A)". Anyone have any idea?
Here is part of the ref:
The documentation submitted is not sufficient to warrant favorable consideration of your petition/application. The following information is also required:
You have request classification as an alien of extrordinary ability. The satandard for this classification is very high....
... here are the discussion of ten criteria...
... after that specific evidence...
While you evidence has addressed some of the listed criteria, in respect to none of the criteria did it indicate that you are at the very top of your field when compared to all others in the field, regardless of age or experience. In determining whether you meet a specific criterion, the evidence must be evaluated in terms of whether it establishes that you have sustained national or international acclaim.
Have any researchers ever cited your work or published material which indicates that your work has made an impact on your field? if so, please submit copies of the published material.
... I only have 3 journal papers published and another just accepted. Usually it takes 2 year for a paper to be printed on the journal after first submition. So this is only one citation.
... Dr.AAA reported that you developed the XXX model, a report affimed by Dr. BBB, Dr. CCC and yourself. However, on your resume you indicated that the model had already been developed but you made improvements to it. Please clarify this discrepancy. Were you the first to develop XXX. If not, why did you, Dr. AAA and Dr. BBB indicte you did?
... It is my thesis. I wrote 90% of the model. When I compare to the old model in the institute, I said the improvement.
AAA is my advisor
BBB is my thesis committee. A president of an internation assocition.
CCC is my current boss.
who should I ask for letter to clearify this.
Please submit the complete copy of your atticle in which pypou reported developing AAA.
Have the models which you have developed, including XXX, influed the research of other hydraulic scientists or engineers or been utilized by them? if so, please submit evidence of this.
You have been on detail to the ***(A government research office) for over two and a half years. What are your specific achievements over that period of time? Dr. CCC reported that you have "Improved and enhanced that BBB model," but the evidence does not establish the major significance of that achievement.
If any experits in your field beyond your circle of acquaintances believe that you have surpassed the level of nearly all others in the field, regardless of age or experience, please submit their statements so stating supported by their reasons for believing that you have already risen to a level above nearly all other hydraulic scientist.
Please help me and any suggestions are welcome.
Some background:
one awards from China (10 years old)
associate member of ASCE
2 papers published in China, 3 published in american, one submitted, one just published after receive the Ref
6 conference papers
review one paper for Journal, reviewed another two recently.
My new model is used by many government funded projects.
Anyone has any idea that I got identical refs for EB1 and NIW. I heard that I can submit both.
Any suggestions are really appreciated.
Wang
Here is part of the ref:
The documentation submitted is not sufficient to warrant favorable consideration of your petition/application. The following information is also required:
You have request classification as an alien of extrordinary ability. The satandard for this classification is very high....
... here are the discussion of ten criteria...
... after that specific evidence...
While you evidence has addressed some of the listed criteria, in respect to none of the criteria did it indicate that you are at the very top of your field when compared to all others in the field, regardless of age or experience. In determining whether you meet a specific criterion, the evidence must be evaluated in terms of whether it establishes that you have sustained national or international acclaim.
Have any researchers ever cited your work or published material which indicates that your work has made an impact on your field? if so, please submit copies of the published material.
... I only have 3 journal papers published and another just accepted. Usually it takes 2 year for a paper to be printed on the journal after first submition. So this is only one citation.
... Dr.AAA reported that you developed the XXX model, a report affimed by Dr. BBB, Dr. CCC and yourself. However, on your resume you indicated that the model had already been developed but you made improvements to it. Please clarify this discrepancy. Were you the first to develop XXX. If not, why did you, Dr. AAA and Dr. BBB indicte you did?
... It is my thesis. I wrote 90% of the model. When I compare to the old model in the institute, I said the improvement.
AAA is my advisor
BBB is my thesis committee. A president of an internation assocition.
CCC is my current boss.
who should I ask for letter to clearify this.
Please submit the complete copy of your atticle in which pypou reported developing AAA.
Have the models which you have developed, including XXX, influed the research of other hydraulic scientists or engineers or been utilized by them? if so, please submit evidence of this.
You have been on detail to the ***(A government research office) for over two and a half years. What are your specific achievements over that period of time? Dr. CCC reported that you have "Improved and enhanced that BBB model," but the evidence does not establish the major significance of that achievement.
If any experits in your field beyond your circle of acquaintances believe that you have surpassed the level of nearly all others in the field, regardless of age or experience, please submit their statements so stating supported by their reasons for believing that you have already risen to a level above nearly all other hydraulic scientist.
Please help me and any suggestions are welcome.
Some background:
one awards from China (10 years old)
associate member of ASCE
2 papers published in China, 3 published in american, one submitted, one just published after receive the Ref
6 conference papers
review one paper for Journal, reviewed another two recently.
My new model is used by many government funded projects.
Anyone has any idea that I got identical refs for EB1 and NIW. I heard that I can submit both.
Any suggestions are really appreciated.
Wang
Last edited by a moderator: