Hey, we cannot say they are not hiring. They are hiring on some stupid anti-fraud unit that is probably proud of turning out cases like this:
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/070313elpaso.htm?searchstring=denaturalize
Waste of good taxpayer money if you ask me.
Every day I think more and more that this "forecasting" backog problem is political, as in Republicans want to delay naturalizations and Democrats like to speed them up.
It gets tiring to hear that they will never sacrifice the security checks, and use that as justification on not speeding up processing. The problem is that the security checks add an unbound time to the application processing, as we have seen with name checks. I think they should be smarter than that and either use some random checks instead of checks for everyone, and whenever an application gets stuck on name check it should be reviewed by an experienced IO to determine if the delay is justified or not. If the applicant appears to be low risk I would adjudicate the application instead of waiting forever.
My 2 cents.
What I said/meant about hiring was "they should have hired sometime before they increased fees took into affect."
Not decide to hire afterwards. Even afterwords they should have been prompt in hiring an adequate number.
They should have known from past experiences that there will be a deluge of applications as people try to beat the fee increase.
They should have planned it before. It is very hard to believe they did not know that.