Well, friends, here is it, the famous three-page thing, contending that I have to submit additional evidence on all counts, a letter that looks like all-inclusive guidelines to compling an NIW case.
Just one cute example:
"Submit evidence which clearly demonstrates that you are onw of the foremost leading authorities within your field and that your personal performance has/will SUBSTANTIALLY influence, above and beyond that of any other programmer/analyst."
- Hah? so then, four member of the National Academy stating just that - are not authoritative enough or what?
- I am a physicist, and not a programmer, nor analyst.
This RFE is generic, is not it? It seems that not many people are getting this kind of RFE, am I right?
What is your opinion? The question is:
Should I try to answer this RFE myself ? The thing is, I devised my petition specifically to address all the prongs of NIW, and now that they are ALL relisted in the RFE, should I give up and take my case to the lawyer?
--------------
PhD in physics.
Post-doc in a government lab.
15 publications, in very good / excellent journals,
first author of most of them.
about 50 citations.
8 recommendations, about half from independent experts.
Just one cute example:
"Submit evidence which clearly demonstrates that you are onw of the foremost leading authorities within your field and that your personal performance has/will SUBSTANTIALLY influence, above and beyond that of any other programmer/analyst."
- Hah? so then, four member of the National Academy stating just that - are not authoritative enough or what?
- I am a physicist, and not a programmer, nor analyst.
This RFE is generic, is not it? It seems that not many people are getting this kind of RFE, am I right?
What is your opinion? The question is:
Should I try to answer this RFE myself ? The thing is, I devised my petition specifically to address all the prongs of NIW, and now that they are ALL relisted in the RFE, should I give up and take my case to the lawyer?
--------------
PhD in physics.
Post-doc in a government lab.
15 publications, in very good / excellent journals,
first author of most of them.
about 50 citations.
8 recommendations, about half from independent experts.
Last edited by a moderator: