talli sagoo
Registered Users (C)
unitednations, what percentage of the forum members, do you think belong to those corrupt 'consulting' firms you always quote? If you do not have a number stop being a fear mongrer, yes, stop it now. I had cautioned you earlier too.
You are good at interpreting USCIS laws, stick to it. Don't go overboard by giving unnecessary scary scenarios in the name of 'playing devil's advocate' or whatever you do, to advertise, as someone pointed out to run your CPA/immigration advisory shop. Do not use this forum as advertising ground. get it??
It's one thing to be realistic and yet another thing to be putting words/fears into majority of the forum members' minds, who are clean.
When someone (e.g hipka) points you to published articles on economic contributions immigrants make to the US you shamelessly said you did not have "patience" to read those articles, and yet you ask people to guide you to such studies. You might already know that AILA lobbied with the help of over hundred of big companies for H1b and EB visa increase. They are 'employers' and they are not dumb.
When someone tries to be smart, you try to over smart them by showing off and explaining how you rub your ass with big honchos of the corporate world. It's not gonna help. If some of us start quoting who we interact with, you may find your 'cohorts' less than adequate. so stop showing off in the name whatever...
one more thing, if one hires a discourse analyst to do a linguistic profiling of your words used in this portal, someone may get the impression that you should rather belong to numbersusa or other anti-immigrants groups, which may not be true, as you yourself are an immigrant. I think if you qualify your idiosyncratic positions with "IMHO" you may get away.
Again, you are good at interpreting USCIS laws and numbers, stick to it.
You are good at interpreting USCIS laws, stick to it. Don't go overboard by giving unnecessary scary scenarios in the name of 'playing devil's advocate' or whatever you do, to advertise, as someone pointed out to run your CPA/immigration advisory shop. Do not use this forum as advertising ground. get it??
It's one thing to be realistic and yet another thing to be putting words/fears into majority of the forum members' minds, who are clean.
When someone (e.g hipka) points you to published articles on economic contributions immigrants make to the US you shamelessly said you did not have "patience" to read those articles, and yet you ask people to guide you to such studies. You might already know that AILA lobbied with the help of over hundred of big companies for H1b and EB visa increase. They are 'employers' and they are not dumb.
When someone tries to be smart, you try to over smart them by showing off and explaining how you rub your ass with big honchos of the corporate world. It's not gonna help. If some of us start quoting who we interact with, you may find your 'cohorts' less than adequate. so stop showing off in the name whatever...
one more thing, if one hires a discourse analyst to do a linguistic profiling of your words used in this portal, someone may get the impression that you should rather belong to numbersusa or other anti-immigrants groups, which may not be true, as you yourself are an immigrant. I think if you qualify your idiosyncratic positions with "IMHO" you may get away.
Again, you are good at interpreting USCIS laws and numbers, stick to it.
unitednations said:Maybe I am not articulating or people are misunderstanding on purpose because it doesn't fit their needs.
Employment base greencard is simple. Company needs a worker in a specific job, specific location and can't find ready, willing, able American worker. Nothing more, nothing less. How much you time you spend here, how much you contribute to social security, whether your wife can/will work, whether a company will outsource because of the skills you are taking back with you are all immaterial arguments that have nothing to do with this concept.
My postings are based on; refuting the reasons of why people think the economy, america is being harmed. No one has come up with any good reason. Most reasons everyone has come up with are "humanitarian" which has nothing to do with employment base greencard.
People need to understand the concept of it before they continue to complain about it. I am showing how people are gaming/cheating the system whether on purpose or inadvertently and isn't within the spirit of the law. Just about every reason people are using has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE HARM/BENEFIT to the economy, rather it is to harm to individual people.
I say increase the quota; take spouses away from quota; let everyone in if there is an employer who needs their services. I honest to goodness feel this way. However, it is not a workable solution for many, many reasons.
I never said most people won't get greencards. Many people do. However, it is lurking in the background that it is going to get extremely tougher.
In the last year this is what I know either directly or indirectly:
USCIS denying 140's due to no permanent job
USCIS revoking approved 140's due to company filing too many cases
People being arrested for selling labors, creating labors
Companies shutting down due to h-1b violations non payment of h-1b wages
Consulates sending referrals to Fraud detection units to verify legitimacy of job offers
Consulates sending referrals to department of labor for h-1b violations of non payment of wages
USCIS warning people from switching too early on h-1b when they come into the country
DOL becoming more strict in their enforcement of h-1b violations
backlog labor processing centers requesting considerable amount of information for satellite offices and denying labors.
___________________________________________________
All of the above is/will be leading for it to get tougher and tougher. In the background many things are going on. People will continue to get greencards but I also think people should be prudent when they are discussing increasing quota. Behind the scenes there is a lot of sentiment that employment base greencard is being abused.