Flash: Visa Update for July..

I align with Jackolantern. I was thinking the same. There is no way USCIS used 60,000 visa number in June 2007 as stated in July Visa Update. Do not think Service centers(TSC+NSC+Consulates) are capable to use 60,000 visas in a month. I feel like service centers requested visa numbers for each pending application and got/reserved for each application. Now they will start processing in coming 3 months (Until October 01, 2007) .

Though 60,000 looks like a big number there is no way of telling that it cannot be given in a month. There are so many US consulates around the world that give visas in addition to adjustment of status(i-485) that there could have been a deluge of approvals which led to exhasuting visa numbers.

EB3
GC recd: June 07
 
What do you think they did before June, They all going for paid summer vacation.

We also have to take it as a part of life and move on with our plan.

If all visas are issued (60000) in June, assume so?,and they are not going to receive any more applications then what all these immigration officers will do?
 
From http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/Oppenheim070606.pdf
(Hat tip: CAlcawaiting),
At the beginning of each month, the Visa Office (VO) receives a report from each consular post
listing totals of documentarily-qualified immigrant visa applicants in categories subject to
numerical limitation
. Cases are grouped in three different categories: 1) foreign state
chargeability, 2) preference, and 3) priority date.
And on the next page:
VO subdivides the annual preference and foreign state limitations specified by the INA into
monthly allotments. The totals of documentarily-qualified applicants which have been reported
to VO are compared each month with the numbers available for the next regular allotment. The
determination of how many numbers are available requires consideration of several variables,
including: past number use; estimates of future number use and return rates; and estimates of
USCIS demand based on cut-off date movements. Once this consideration is completed, the cutoff
dates are established and numbers are allocated to reported applicants in order of their
priority dates, the oldest dates first.
If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarilyqualified
demand, the category is considered "Current." For example: If the monthly allocation
target is 10,000, and we only have 5,000 applicants, the category can be "Current.”
and on page 3,
Visa numbers are always allotted for all documentarily-qualified applicants with a priority date
before the relevant cut-off date, as long as the case had been reported to VO in time to be
included in the monthly calculation of visa availability.

This is probably what happened in June 2007:
USCIS sent the list of documentarily-qualified (pre-adjudicated) applicants to DOS in the 1st week of June.
All the documentarily-qualified applicants were allotted a visa number, and yet, the quota for July was not met, So DOS made the numbers current for July.
Between then and the end of June, a lot of those whose priority dates were current in June, and who were not reported as documentarily-qualified for the June bulletin but became qualified in June were approved by USCIS and consumed more visa numbers than anticipated. This took DOS by surprise.

End result: A lot of applicants who were reported as being documentarily-qualified by USCIS for July allocations will get approval notices between now and Sep 30 2007.
So everything hinges on whether USCIS reported you as being documentarily-qualified in the 1st week of June!

Sachatur

PS: I know Oppenheim was talking primarily about FB visas, but the same procedure should apply to EB visas as well.

PPS: This is just my interpretation. I'm not a lawyer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Though 60,000 looks like a big number there is no way of telling that it cannot be given in a month. There are so many US consulates around the world that give visas in addition to adjustment of status(i-485) that there could have been a deluge of approvals which led to exhasuting visa numbers.

EB3
GC recd: June 07

I agree that 60,000 numbers are given by DOS to USCIS in June, 2007 but I doubt USCIS has approved all 60,000 cases. So what I think visa numbers are assigned for each pending application and they will be approved within next 3 months.
 
USCIS can not approve any single application, if visa number for that category not available. For example, EB2/India with PD June 04 and RD August 05 can not be approve before June 30, 07 as June visa bulletin had April 04 cut off date for EB2/India. Now they can not approve this case in July 2007 as they declared Unavailable. If they have alloted visa number to this case in June 2007, they should give cut off date May 04 for EB2/India.
Now they haven't established any cutoff date in July 2007 revised VB, they can not approve this case in any circumstances.
They clearly mentioned No more visa for any category for Fiscal Year 2007. If your assumption is right, they have to establish cutoff date in August or September 2007 and the cutoff date would be the date of last assigned visa number PD otherwise assigned number will go to gutter!!

I think crazy people are sitting at USCIS and DOS who are getting devil pleasure from frustration of helpless legal immigrants. I can't believe; holding dated for 8 months, all of sudden current all categories and then within 17 days made Unavailable. I can't find any logic but "Conspiracy Theory" (I posted couple of days ago)


I strongly believe that the visa numbers might have been allotted to cases bending and ready to approve and thus there is no more visa available, and in the next 3 months this cases will be approved after scrutiny.
If all visas are issued (60000) in June, assume so?,and they are not going to receive any more applications then what all these immigration officers will do?
 
hi there
what you all think about poor gc holders who married after getting green card and waiting till their 60th birth day to bring their spouse under gc visa, all h1 holders are atleast getting h4 immedietly, please go have a look at the thread called follow to join, by virtue of their green card they all are waiting for her spouse visa for years,so undavanu paa kittanhittu, unnathavanu ila kittanhitttu thats it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Visa bulletin

Now no one is gonna believe the monthly visa bulletin until AOS is applied.How long is the medical valid?

PD May 2004 EB3
Approved on May 12 2007
 
The medical is valid for up to 12 months before applying for the I-485.

gcgame - What was approved for you on May 12, 2007? Your I-140? Labor?
 
Visa Update for July

But one question still remains as the FAQ on Murthy also does not answer what will happen to pending AOS cases like some of them are pending since 2 years or more.
 
Now no one is gonna believe the monthly visa bulletin until AOS is applied.How long is the medical valid?

PD May 2004 EB3
Approved on May 12 2007

my H-1 expires in dec 2007..does this mean I have to apply for extension now ..I guess ..yes ..2007 is turning out to be a good year for lawyers :). I guess the good part is that I didnt go ahead with my new car purchase and new house booking ...
 
Although USCIS has not sent me a receipt notice or even encashed my checks ( packest received on June 8) but for a change I want to say few good words about USCIS.Working for the government I am very well aware about following regulations etc.It looked outright crazy to me when cut off dates moved at snail's pace for one year and within a span of two months everybody was current.It did raise hope for the friends waiting for years to get GC but on a realistic note only people with pending 485 ( where name check etc has been done) could have got GC before Sept 30.
I was very happy as it will let everybody file 485,get EAD for spouses and be eligible for AC-21 in 6 months specially for the friends from backlogged countries and in next few years processing would have been done on these applications too.
You all know that it is a mess and vis bulletin cut off dates have no rationale basis considering all the factors.
I applaud the bureaucrat at USCIS who had decided to take this bold step and must be facing an inquiry right now or possibly termination as Govt tend to look for scapegoat but would had done something for legal immigrants but this action raised hope to a new level and eventually disappointment/despair.
 
Where is the 'revised' July bulletin??

I mean the archived July bulletin still shows that all EB are current and if they have revised the bulletin, they should publish a complete 'Revised July 2007 Visa Bulletin' and put it along side the current archived July 2007 bulletin. They can't merely release a mere two-line addendum or corrigendum and then call it a revised July 2007 visa bulletin.
 
Contact your Senator regarding unprecedented move by the Department of State

Hello, If you all can then please contact your senator.
Below is the letter I sent to my local senator.
You can find your local senator by using this link (Enter zip code and state) - http://capwiz.com/aila2/officials/congress/?lvl=C&azip=75063&state=TX.
You can also send email from this link.
It does not matter whether this brings any value or not but there is no harm in doing this, in case you are really frustated, troubled and sad!.
BTW --> Thanks to user Vall for this nicely formatted letter.

Dear Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison:

This is to bring to your attention regarding an unprecedented move by Department of State with regards to filing of adjustment of status applications.

On June 13, Department of State announced in its Visa Bulletin for July 2007 that all employment-based categories (except for the Other Workers category) for immigrant visas will be "current," (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html) meaning that individuals/businesses going through the lengthy and backlogged immigrant visa or "green card" process can, throughout July, file adjustment of status applications.

The Department Of State regulations at 22 CFR 42.51 (http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_05/22cfr42_05.html) and 8 CFR 245.1(g), allows individuals/businesses to rely on and use such information. Historically, they have relied on such information knowing that when they prepare and file such applications, they will be accepted and adjudicated.

However on July 2, 2007, The Department of State issued a new bulletin (http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_3263.html) with an update on July Visa Availability and USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services) started rejecting adjustment of status applications for several employment-based immigration preference categories (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/VisaBulletin2Jul07.pdf), despite the fact that the published July Visa Bulletin shows that visas for these categories are available thereby violating its long-standing policy and the expectations of thousands of people, without any advance notification to the general public or issuing any notification under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). Such a revision, coming in the same month in which the bulletin is issued, would be contrary to years of practice in which revisions or adjustments to the availability of immigrant visa numbers are made in the following month of before the beginning of the month, not in the same month individuals and businesses have begun preparing and submitting applications for adjustment of status.

By taking this unprecedented mid-month update, the Departments of State and Homeland Security have seriously undermined the stability and predictability of U.S. immigration law. Thousands of individuals and businesses rely on the monthly bulletins to prepare and plan for the submission of applications. In addition, individuals have taken the necessary steps to prepare and file applications for adjustment of status, including thousands of dollars of expenses to engage counsel, flights for employees to quickly obtain necessary documents and medical exams for the applications, cancellation of business and holiday travel, changes in family plans to ensure families are in the proper location, etc. This unprecedented action of the government is shocking and disturbing. It has left many in a state of disbelief, frustration, confusion, and anger.

Pursuant to Department Of State regulations 8 CFR 245.1(g), f the applicant [for adjustment of status] is a preference alien, the current Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs Visa Bulletin will be consulted to determine whether an immigrant visa is immediately available.. Thus, when the Visa Bulletin shows that visas for most preference categories are available for applicants with priority dates on or before the listed priority date, the USCIS must accept those adjustment of status applications for adjudication. Under section 245 of the INA, an alien may apply for adjustment of status if, inter alia, (3) an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is filed. The question is what the term immediately available means. The regulation at 8 CFR 245.1(g) defines the term and instructs how to determine when an immigrant visa is immediately available under Sec. 245 of the INA.

8 CFR 245.1(g) states, An alien is ineligible for the benefits of section 245 of the Act unless an immigrant visa is immediately available to him or her at the time the application is filed. If the applicant is a preference alien, the current Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs Visa Bulletin will be consulted to determine whether an immigrant visa is immediately available. An immigrant visa is considered available for accepting and processing the application Form I-485 i[f] the preference category applicant has a priority date on the waiting list which is earlier than the date shown in the Bulletin (or the Bulletin shows that that numbers for visa applicants in his or her category are current). An immigrant visa is also considered immediately available if the applicant establishes eligibility for the benefits of Public Law 101-238. Information concerning the immediate availability of an immigrant visa may be obtained at any Service Office. (Emphasis added.)

Reliance on the current Visa Bulletin is well-established. In 1994, the INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) published a revision to 8 CFR Part 245 in response to enactment of section 245(i) of the Act. In the Supplementary Information provided with that regulation, the INS took the opportunity to revise its definition of immediately available to be consistent with that of the Department of State.

The INS said: All applicants for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act must have an immediately available immigrant visa number. "Immediately available" for the
purpose of accepting and processing the Form I-485 application filed by a preference alien is defined in 8 CFR 245.1(f) as being not later than the date shown in the current Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs Visa Bulletin. The Department of State, however, defines "immediately available" as being earlier than the date shown in the current Visa Bulletin. This rule amends 8 CFR 245.1(f) to bring the adjustment of status provision into accordance with the Department o f State's definition.

I request your prompt attention on this matter asking the Department of State for clarification on this unprecedented change which defies years of established process of individuals/businesses relying on visa bulletin to prepare and file adjustment of status applications.

Sincerely,
 
Top