Nope.naanshi said:GC_Gone_Case,
Any Latest Updates???
naanshi
Hi aws,aws said:Please reply ASAP, thanks!
-aws
Hi naanshi,naanshi said:GC_Gone_Case,
Did you attorney receive any letter from USCIS this week? Can you find out?
naanshi.
Hi naanshi,naanshi said:GC_Gone_Case,
No response from USCIS yet? Any change in the LUD?
naanshi
GC_GoneCase said:Hi naanshi,
No LUD change after 7/28. No response by email or postal mail.
What do you feel these guys are upto? Why were they updating the case so many times if they did not want to change the status?
Thanks.
aws said:naanshi/GC_gone case:
where are u upto guys?
any update on your I140s...?
good luck.
unitednations said:naanshi, I've been waiting to see your approval. I guess no luck yet.
I'm attaching a pdf that has minutes of the board of directors for aila and uscis. It seems they clarified the changing employers before 140 approval. It would be allowed.
Below is my interpretation:
Since they say the 485 ports to new employer and ability to pay has to be met right to priority date then one could conclude that the new employer is the one who has to meet ability to pay.
Could be good news for you.
unitednations said:naanshi, I've been waiting to see your approval. I guess no luck yet.
I'm attaching a pdf that has minutes of the board of directors for aila and uscis. It seems they clarified the changing employers before 140 approval. It would be allowed.
Below is my interpretation:
Since they say the 485 ports to new employer and ability to pay has to be met right to priority date then one could conclude that the new employer is the one who has to meet ability to pay.
Could be good news for you.
unitednations said:http://www.jenkens.com/jenkens/practicearea.asp?practice=immigration
http://www.jenkens.com/jenkens/jenkensarticleview.asp?articleid=580
This would definitely be good news. I don't know when uscis will provide official guidance. However, naanshi has been a big supporter in the past regarding what the laws actually say.
Big part of this is if the ability to pay issue also transfers to new employer. If 140 had to be approved then it meant that 140 employer would have to meet ability to pay first before ac21 could be used. However, if everything is portable to the new employer then it would help greatly on this issue.
It makes me a little skeptical of uscis intention. I have a feeling their not going to come out with anything official until they determine that they can process applications within six months.
GC_GoneCase said:Hi unitednations,
Even if USCIS does not come out with the new law, it would be good as long as they clear the cases where 140 / 485 have been pending for more than 180 days.
I am a test case. My 140 was withdrawn in March this year, almost 240 days after 140/485 with 140 pending for approval.
I had sent a letter for AC21 immediately after that.