Filing I-130 + I-485 for a parent who is currently on B1

Karaya

Registered Users (C)
I realize this question most likely was discussed here for a zillion times, but mistakes in dealing with USCIS are very costly, so I would really appreciate if someone would bother to answer it one more time...

My wife and I have our oath ceremony scheduled in a couple of weeks. After that we want to apply for a Green Card for my mother-in-law, who are currently here in the US on B1 visa. We have about 2 months between our oath ceremony and the end of her authorized stay. So my questions are:
- I understand we can file both I-130 and I-485 applications at the same time for my in-law right after we become citizens, is it correct?
- If yes and we file the apps, can she legally remain in the US after the date of her authorized stay ?
- If yes again, is there anything else should we do beside filing I-130+I-485 to maintain her legal status in the US (some notification forms or whatever)?
- Anything else I should be aware of, any advise?

Thanks!
 
A1: Yes
A2: Yes
A3: File I-131 and I-765 too. They are free.
A4: Yes. Be prepared for the possibility to defend the decision to AOS instead of going the CP route.

- I understand we can file both I-130 and I-485 applications at the same time for my in-law right after we become citizens, is it correct?
- If yes and we file the apps, can she legally remain in the US after the date of her authorized stay ?
- If yes again, is there anything else should we do beside filing I-130+I-485 to maintain her legal status in the US (some notification forms or whatever)?
- Anything else I should be aware of, any advise?
 
Thanks, Triple Citizen!

Could you elaborate a bit regarding the possibility to have to defend the AOS route? What kind of objections/accusations can we face, what arguments for our choice can we use?

Thanks again!

A1: Yes
A2: Yes
A3: File I-131 and I-765 too. They are free.
A4: Yes. Be prepared for the possibility to defend the decision to AOS instead of going the CP route.
 
Argument has to be the truth, nothing more nothing else. If the decision to immigrate was made after enteriing the US as a visitor, she will be fine.

Could you elaborate a bit regarding the possibility to have to defend the AOS route? What kind of objections/accusations can we face, what arguments for our choice can we use?
 
Argument has to be the truth, nothing more nothing else.
I wish it was the case, we would be living in a much better world...:D
But unfortunately it's not about the truth, it's about what you can prove. And in this situation the burden of proof is on us. I doubt a narration of family discussions will be admitted as a convincing evidences, so what will be admitted?
 
Top