F1 rejected. Right reasons?
Hello, I'd like to ask a few questions regarding the reasons for which a student visa is refused.
My friend applied for a student visa and was rejected on account of:
1) the qualifications she'll receive at the end of the course will not be valid in her home country
2) the clearance officer is not satisfied with her applying for more than just English course
3) the clearance officer is not satisfied with her applying for this particular college
Now, I have done my own little research and found a flaw for each reason the clearance officer gave.
For 1) I found that there's a legal government body that deals with foreign qualifications who analyze and evaluate them before they are recognized in the country. Therefore the qualification can have it's equal worth as it does in the country it was originally issued. So is the clearance officer in the right legal position to make such decision?
For 2) I haven't found much on this one but I wouldn't think there'd be a problem with applying for more than one course, is there?
And for 3) the college which she applied for is a legal governing higher education institute, so what's not appropriate?
Personally, I just think that the clearance officer doesn't know how to do his job properly but I would also like to hear from anyone of you who knows anything.
Many thanks
Hello, I'd like to ask a few questions regarding the reasons for which a student visa is refused.
My friend applied for a student visa and was rejected on account of:
1) the qualifications she'll receive at the end of the course will not be valid in her home country
2) the clearance officer is not satisfied with her applying for more than just English course
3) the clearance officer is not satisfied with her applying for this particular college
Now, I have done my own little research and found a flaw for each reason the clearance officer gave.
For 1) I found that there's a legal government body that deals with foreign qualifications who analyze and evaluate them before they are recognized in the country. Therefore the qualification can have it's equal worth as it does in the country it was originally issued. So is the clearance officer in the right legal position to make such decision?
For 2) I haven't found much on this one but I wouldn't think there'd be a problem with applying for more than one course, is there?
And for 3) the college which she applied for is a legal governing higher education institute, so what's not appropriate?
Personally, I just think that the clearance officer doesn't know how to do his job properly but I would also like to hear from anyone of you who knows anything.
Many thanks
Last edited by a moderator: