My sponsor is preparing the employment letter to be submitted
with the I-485 and has asked me if adding the corporate seal
(the one with the embosser) next to the signature would be
something positive.
I would say yes, but I'm turning the question to the more
experienced people on the forum. Here are the scenarios
I see:
1) It's positive (it adds strength to the authenticity of the
document)
2) It' neutral (it doesn't make any difference)
3) It's negative (it's an inappropriate use of the corporate seal
that is supposed to be used only in special circumstances
such as certificates)
I add that my sponsor's signature leans more towards a scribble
than a complex one, but the INS has never disputed it in previous
documents. Moreover, this is an AOS, not a consular processing
from a country where the notarized signature is almost
standard. My sponsor just wanted to do something good, not
something that turns out to be wrong.
Thank you very much, and good luck!
with the I-485 and has asked me if adding the corporate seal
(the one with the embosser) next to the signature would be
something positive.
I would say yes, but I'm turning the question to the more
experienced people on the forum. Here are the scenarios
I see:
1) It's positive (it adds strength to the authenticity of the
document)
2) It' neutral (it doesn't make any difference)
3) It's negative (it's an inappropriate use of the corporate seal
that is supposed to be used only in special circumstances
such as certificates)
I add that my sponsor's signature leans more towards a scribble
than a complex one, but the INS has never disputed it in previous
documents. Moreover, this is an AOS, not a consular processing
from a country where the notarized signature is almost
standard. My sponsor just wanted to do something good, not
something that turns out to be wrong.
Thank you very much, and good luck!