I-140 EB1-EA/filed @ NSC
1) The award you submitted was academic in nature. USCIS maintains that student awards such as fellowships, scholarships do not meet this criteria. Do you have anythingelse that is nationally recognized? Show me the subjective evidence for selection for this award and how this is nationally recognized award.
2) You submitted your work at research meetings. That is what researchers are supposed to do. How is your work above and beyond what is out there in those meetings? "Consequently, it does not follow that all scientists who are asked to present their findings enjoy sustained acclaim in their field". Show me how your presentation history exceeds others.
3) Show the clear evidence that you have performed a leading and critical role in your organization.
4) You published several papers. But scientists are supposed to publish and dessiminate their work. Please resubmit updated citation listing. Please submit objective listing that your publication history exceeds the rest of the field.
Gurus... do I have a chance with these questions. I don't have any other national or international award such as Presidential Medal or Nobel Prize.
My presentation at international conferences are posters. Nothing great such as plenary talk.
I can submit more evidence of publications and citations.
Letter about my role and responsibilities as leader in my institution.
Thats it. Do I have a chance?
-------------------------------------------------
Initial evidence submitted:
Ph.D. from USA
6 Papers published and several submitted
5 international conferences
2 invited presentations
11 letters of recos from all over the world
Scientific Achievement Award
1 contract to write a invited review
---------------------------------------------------
With identical evidence, my EB2-NIW was approved.
1) The award you submitted was academic in nature. USCIS maintains that student awards such as fellowships, scholarships do not meet this criteria. Do you have anythingelse that is nationally recognized? Show me the subjective evidence for selection for this award and how this is nationally recognized award.
2) You submitted your work at research meetings. That is what researchers are supposed to do. How is your work above and beyond what is out there in those meetings? "Consequently, it does not follow that all scientists who are asked to present their findings enjoy sustained acclaim in their field". Show me how your presentation history exceeds others.
3) Show the clear evidence that you have performed a leading and critical role in your organization.
4) You published several papers. But scientists are supposed to publish and dessiminate their work. Please resubmit updated citation listing. Please submit objective listing that your publication history exceeds the rest of the field.
Gurus... do I have a chance with these questions. I don't have any other national or international award such as Presidential Medal or Nobel Prize.
My presentation at international conferences are posters. Nothing great such as plenary talk.
I can submit more evidence of publications and citations.
Letter about my role and responsibilities as leader in my institution.
Thats it. Do I have a chance?
-------------------------------------------------
Initial evidence submitted:
Ph.D. from USA
6 Papers published and several submitted
5 international conferences
2 invited presentations
11 letters of recos from all over the world
Scientific Achievement Award
1 contract to write a invited review
---------------------------------------------------
With identical evidence, my EB2-NIW was approved.