CSC: RD-Jan '03, RFE-May '04, AD-Sept. '04.
Quals:
1. PhD in Engineering '04,
2. >25 journal/conf. publications
3. >25 citations in journals/company site, one of the journal papers further advanced on my work
4. 5 patents (1 issued) some being licensed by companies
5. best paper at intl. conf., etc.
6. Reviewer for 4 intl. journals--was solicited to review either by the Editor or Assoc. Editor of these journals
7. Session chair at an intl. conf.
8. co-author of book in preparation
9. magazines with intl. circulation discussed my work, one of the journal papers further advanced on my work
10. gave evidence that I played critical role in companies with dist. reputations
11. 3 references with original petition and 4 references after RFE
The Adjudicator RFE'd, rightfully so, requesting additional information/evidence as he/she felt that my petition was deficient in all categories. For my response to RFE, I got info from this site and went through all of the AAO decisions to craft the response. The attorney took a quick glance at my draft, slightly modified it, signed and sent it to the USCIS. I also sent quite a bit of new evidence and information.
The initial petition was poorly crafted by the paralegal, in the attorney's office, and at that time I had not taken the time to review it critically. A lot of stress would have been avoided if I had done this hard work myself right at the outset.
Best wishes to others who are still waiting for their 140 decision or are planning to file.
Quals:
1. PhD in Engineering '04,
2. >25 journal/conf. publications
3. >25 citations in journals/company site, one of the journal papers further advanced on my work
4. 5 patents (1 issued) some being licensed by companies
5. best paper at intl. conf., etc.
6. Reviewer for 4 intl. journals--was solicited to review either by the Editor or Assoc. Editor of these journals
7. Session chair at an intl. conf.
8. co-author of book in preparation
9. magazines with intl. circulation discussed my work, one of the journal papers further advanced on my work
10. gave evidence that I played critical role in companies with dist. reputations
11. 3 references with original petition and 4 references after RFE
The Adjudicator RFE'd, rightfully so, requesting additional information/evidence as he/she felt that my petition was deficient in all categories. For my response to RFE, I got info from this site and went through all of the AAO decisions to craft the response. The attorney took a quick glance at my draft, slightly modified it, signed and sent it to the USCIS. I also sent quite a bit of new evidence and information.
The initial petition was poorly crafted by the paralegal, in the attorney's office, and at that time I had not taken the time to review it critically. A lot of stress would have been avoided if I had done this hard work myself right at the outset.
Best wishes to others who are still waiting for their 140 decision or are planning to file.