Britsimon
Super Moderator
He has helped many people acquire Dv visas- and probably he might have encountered some refusal cases as well.i guess not only on this forum- i belive he knows people in real life who might have been refused- thus might be in possession of some copies of refusal documentations.come on he is an ‘expert’ in the dv process, with great knowledge, writing blogs etc. No related docs of evidence? Well, that’s ok. Let’s not drag this issue pls.
So he is an agent then?
I think he was referring to me.
USA14 - when people are refused I don't ask them for denial proof.
To be clear about the place of birth issue - minor differences in describing the place of birth when that isn't impactful is not an issue. For instance, Camden is a part of London. If I put Camden or London - both are OK since both are correct.
However, if the applicant produced a place of birth document that shows a town in Nigeria for instance, that would do it. Further to that a difference in the place of birth could give rise to concerns about the legitimacy of the documents themselves or that the applicant is has tried to conceal something. For example if the FBI name search has been done on Ben Smith from Accra and the guy turns up as Ben Smith from Tamale it might be considered an attempt to commit a fraud (multiple entries).
The point is not that Ghanaian COs are getting more strict - its just that they are faced with levels of inaccuracy and fraud that does not happen in some other embassies. Again - we can look to the agents as the source of a lot of this chaos, along with a cultural acceptance that "economy with the truth" is OK somehow.