LucyMO said:
beware of lawyers who are offering their services on a forum.
I take offense to your post, justifiably so.
Everyone should "beware" of any service they consider investing into, in any context. That's just common sense. It's very easy to thoroughly research the background of any lawyer you are considering asking to represent you, and I recommend all clients do that.
I happen to be a well-credentialed attorney in the litigation division of a large law firm, who does not regularly practice immigration law but does enjoy litigating against the USCIS in DV lottery cases. If you, Lucy, would bother sending me an email I'd be happy to provide you with my background and you'd see I don't have much of a financial stake in marketing myself here. I just enjoy suing the bastards at the USCIS, and I know how to do it successfully. I succeeded in doing so last year with a client who won the DV lottery but came within 10 days of the September 30 deadline without receiving her adjustment of status. I took the USCIS to federal court and won an injunctive order, and the client received her status exactly one day before the 2003 visas ran out. I also received an order compelling the USCIS to pay part of my attorney fees, even though I had represented this client pro bono (for free). [Note: I only rarely take pro bono cases.]
Other attorneys have also succeeded in such cases when the circumstances are right, most of whom are not immigration lawyers. You should know that many immigration lawyers are not comfortable suing the USCIS/DHS because they have to maintain a cordial relationship with these very agencies as part of their regular practice.
Writing your Congressman may be helpful, but doing so will not protect your legal rights. If the September 30 deadline passes, or the number of visas issued reaches the numerical limit, the DV lottery winner has no recourse whatsoever, even if you ask a federal court to intervene.