Do we know anyone whose GC has been revoked at the time of naturalization???

dashDurai

Registered Users (C)
Do we know anyone whose GC has been revoked at the time of naturalization, given that the person left the job as soon as GC was approved ? Or this is just a hypothesis. How much GC sponser was involved in those cases ? What if GC sponsor remains inactive and let the employee go w/o any issue. Any idea ?
 
dashDurai said:
Do we know anyone whose GC has been revoked at the time of naturalization, given that the person left the job as soon as GC was approved ? Or this is just a hypothesis. How much GC sponser was involved in those cases ? What if GC sponsor remains inactive and let the employee go w/o any issue. Any idea ?

They dont care when you quit working for your sponsored employer (I am ofcourse refering to the naturalization process).
 
JoeF said:
It is unlikely that people who run into such a problem post here or in other forums, though. For one, most people don't even know that such forums exist, and second, they have other, more pressing issues than posting on some forum.
This is totally irrelavant to the topic.


If they chose to, they can create a hell for you. The reality is, they don't have the time to look at all your GC dates and investigate your employment history. As long as maintained your status (continous residency), had no issues with FBI check and had all the supporting documents (advance parole etc, if applicable) there should not be any problem. Believe me, I have been through this process and they gave a squat about my employment history.

NOTE: there is a reason these days, as to why they let change jobs well before the GC process is completed.
 
JoeF said:
The fact of the matter is that at the time of becoming a PR, you had to have the good faith intent to work for the sponsoring company.

Completely WRONG. with AC-21 applicant can change employer without affecting GC. So there is no such thing like "good faith intent to work for the sponsoring company". Applicant can leave sponsering employer after 180days of filing I-485 (and 140 approved) without affecting GC. PERIOD.
 
GCLookup:::

You are not in the rythem.. we are not talking about the AC21 (which is before 485 approval). we are talking about after 485 approval.. so .. read.. :mad:



JoeF & phillydude:::

I got confused now.. to whom should i follow :confused: :confused:
 
JoeF said:
" Although AC21 allows the changing of employers if the I-485 is not adjudicated within 180 days, there is no change in the law with respect to the intention of the employer to offer and the employee to undertake "permanent," full-time work with the sponsoring employer for the job advertised...
Therefore, the employee must have a good-faith intention to work for the employer after the green card is approved, and the employer must have a good-faith intention to employ the employee after the green card is approved."


hmmmm ,I think old days back again. Did u read your post carefully, its redundant in case of AC-21. Once applicant change employer where is q/s of "full-time work with the sponsoring employer for the job advertised". Applicant is with new employer and not working anymore on the "Job advertised". You just Don't Get it, Get more old, OLDIE.

You just can't prove point with just some same old link from Murthy site. Somebody's opinion at some point doesn't mean REALITY.
 
dashDurai said:
Do we know anyone whose GC has been revoked at the time of naturalization, given that the person left the job as soon as GC was approved ?

dashDurai, you have very valid q/s. Has anybody answered it "YES" or claimed that they know somebody whose case doomed as he left job after GC. I think those posts can help to answer your q/s, Not somebody's some pigheaded thoughts. So wait for such responses,and till then ignore JoeF
 
JoeF said:
And the new employer becomes the sponsor. It is obvious that you are the one who "doesn't get it"...

You are the only one who makes such bizzare conclusion......

Sponserer is the Employer
1)who approves Labor for applicant
2)who Support and Approves I-140 for applicant
3)who Supports i-485 application.
Does above Common sense is hard to understand for some p*nheads.

JoeF said:
Exactly my point. Your misguided opinion does not match reality...

Its not opinion , its just COMMON SENSE. Might be hard to unserstand for somebody who has none of it
 
It is safe to stay with the sponsoring employer for at least 6 months after approval of GC.
Why is there such an intense desire among so many on this forum to quit the sponsoring employer as soon as the GC is approved. It seems like most people on this forum at IT profession . Is this desire to quit the sponsoring employer something unique to IT? Is it because many IT pros on H-1Bs ae exploited by unsrupulous employers? why do so many find it difficult to stick around for another 6 months with the employer they have been with for a few years?
 
schandrag said:
It is safe to stay with the sponsoring employer for at least 6 months after approval of GC.
Why is there such an intense desire among so many on this forum to quit the sponsoring employer as soon as the GC is approved. It seems like most people on this forum at IT profession . Is this desire to quit the sponsoring employer something unique to IT? Is it because many IT pros on H-1Bs ae exploited by unsrupulous employers? why do so many find it difficult to stick around for another 6 months with the employer they have been with for a few years?

In that case, it would be most safe to stay with the employer forever or until getting citizenship. Wouldn't it??
How about AC-21 case, when applicant changes employer after 180days of 485.Should applicant joint back again sponsering employer??

Some p*head claims that "new employer" becomes sponserer, why, no reason just because p*nhead like that idea.

So the bottomline is Consult lawyer,gather experience from friends/forums and make your call. But don't mislead based on WRONG assumption
 
JoeF said:
And with AR-11, you change the sponsor. Common sense is obviously hard to understand for somebody who has to use infantile expletives.
Grow up, and learn manners.
NOTE:: P*inhead has changed his post after his stupidity. Above comments are his original post.

I seen so many CRAP posts from you But This one is WORST of ALL

Read my following simple english carefully, anybody who joins this forum knows such basics. If you can't understand then don't blame me about telling facts about your p*nhead
AR-11 is for change of Address, not the change of employer.

So as per you, applicant has to file AR-11 when he switchs job (after 180days 485), though applicant is on same address??? dummy. Give ur advice "Grow Up" to your p*nhead that might help
:D :D :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
JoeF said:
You obviously ran out of arguments so that the only thing left for you is to use expletives...
Case closed.

JoeF said:
And with AR-11, you change the sponsor


IS this is the BS argument u have left with? P*inhead , You LOST argument , now GET LOST with ur p*nhead


:D :D :D

My response is
GCLookup said:
AR-11 is for change of Address, not the change of employer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guys:

stop doing this .. my intention..is to get some info from correct people..

GCLookup::

please stop posting on this forum..
 
dashDurai said:
Guys:

stop doing this .. my intention..is to get some info from correct people..

GCLookup::

please stop posting on this forum..

u are starting with incorrect people to get correct info.May god help u.
 
JoeF said:
Well, unfortunately, I can't help it if somebody has a grudge against me and tries to fight with me.

hmm, really, there is BIG LOT who dislikes your attitude.Open up your p*nhead and see REALITY for a change. :D :D :D
 
JoeF said:
Big Lot is a company here in CA...
There are actually only a few people like you who have an attitude. And their vocabulary seems to be limited to childish rants and expletives.

Here you go, But how did you went to BIG LOT??Did someone leave your cage open?

Take ur last word and shove it off :D :D :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top