This is a good discussion
Sangli in Your case it was an avm glitch whereas from the sound of it I think it is question of interpretation that is important
the avm generally moves like this
3 months back process was as follows
person gets fp on day 1
avm on day 15 says \'fp collected and pending review\'
avm on day 45 say \'process resumed\'
now it is
person gets fp on day 1
avm on day 10 says \'fp ....pending review\'
avm on day 15 says \'fp.....process resumed\'
and people call IIO and IIO says information is still pending from
agency/fbi/cia
I feel that it is not possible for FBI/CIA/AGENCY/Local authorities to respond so quickly and that what we are interpreting that \'resumed\' means that Your investigation reports are over and that the case is adjudication ready is an incorrect interpretation
what I feel is that there is still a few steps more for the case to be \'adjudication ready\' and that this is not reflected in avm but is known only if you call IIO
However by calling INS regularly the IIO cannot speed up your case, the IIO can only tell you your status and it is important that You call the IIO only if your case is delayed very very much
At this time I would call for cases before April 01 2001
My 2 cents
Hope other people add to this discussion
rsrgc "AVM Message not correct - Talked to IIO" 2/5/02 4:46pm
Sangli in Your case it was an avm glitch whereas from the sound of it I think it is question of interpretation that is important
the avm generally moves like this
3 months back process was as follows
person gets fp on day 1
avm on day 15 says \'fp collected and pending review\'
avm on day 45 say \'process resumed\'
now it is
person gets fp on day 1
avm on day 10 says \'fp ....pending review\'
avm on day 15 says \'fp.....process resumed\'
and people call IIO and IIO says information is still pending from
agency/fbi/cia
I feel that it is not possible for FBI/CIA/AGENCY/Local authorities to respond so quickly and that what we are interpreting that \'resumed\' means that Your investigation reports are over and that the case is adjudication ready is an incorrect interpretation
what I feel is that there is still a few steps more for the case to be \'adjudication ready\' and that this is not reflected in avm but is known only if you call IIO
However by calling INS regularly the IIO cannot speed up your case, the IIO can only tell you your status and it is important that You call the IIO only if your case is delayed very very much
At this time I would call for cases before April 01 2001
My 2 cents
Hope other people add to this discussion
rsrgc "AVM Message not correct - Talked to IIO" 2/5/02 4:46pm